Which Wlad fight did you enjoy the most?

Against bums, I think you forgot to add :deal

 

Undefeated against who, exactly?

You make this really easy at times SKULL****.

 

She/He is a fellow Klitschko hater & she/he loves Haye & thinks he's a superhero..........................

 

Fightingweight's Dictionary:

Bum - Any fighter that loses to a Klitschko.

:deal Tell me I'm lying..................

 

I actually adjusted at also. Still good though. I have a feeling you a damn good cook:good

 

For the purpose of this argument I think I'll deny that, just to irritate you

In all fairness the Klits have beaten some decent fighters over the years, just no great ones.

If you feel that statement is unfair then please point out the great fighters that they've beaten. I anticipate silence, personally. :good

 

I didn't say they beat great fighters. I def. think they beat some good ones, especially Wlad.

 

good is definitely fair. keep in mind how decent the opponents were when wlad FOUGHT them. A lot of these guys were well regarded at the time, he just ****ed them up so bad we forgot or they tanked.

 

Nah....I'm just an enthusiastic amateur who knows what he likes Chef, lasagne is one of my top 5 favourite dishes so I spent a bit of time making sure it was right that's all - the Henry Hill recipe has the best sauce and meat but when put together created a dry lasagne so I added a few things as you obviously remember.

Cooking is like anything else in life.....you try it once, if it's not right then you adjust it until you get it right. I'm still debating getting some professional training to be honest. I've got a real passion for it but cooking for yourself and cooking for a crowd is like comparing apples and oranges, I'm only interested in my own tastes and from what friends who are pro chefs tell me that's not a good attitude to have

 

And I'd never argue that point, if pushed.

I've always said that WALDOS worst enemy is his crap competition. Maybe if he'd taken on Lewis back in the day and put up a good showing like VITLAY did then people would take him more seriously, I don't know. I don't actively dislike the guy as a person or anything, I just think he's a water carrier, until a real champion comes along.

 

It's always exciting to anticipate and watch the next fight of the world's best fighting machine. Each fight has been special and important to helping develop the evolving fighter he is becoming into. Even the Williamson fight was impressive and important, as it proved he still had the belief to go on.

Looking back, I"d have to say the latest win vs. Chagaev. Because it was an absolute perfect masterpiece of a performance - against an unbeaten and very respected and formidable challenger.

 

FW, there's no such thing as a water carrier dominating the HWT division for years and years and years. The stakes are huge in HWT boxing, everybody is trying and training, but Klitschko is in a league of his own now and nobody has any idea what to do to beat him. You can't pressure him, you can't get close.

Ali, Foreman, Tyson, Frazier, Marciano, you name any man from history, they would all have major problems dealing with this current version - the monstrously dominating machine named Wladimir Klitschko.

Maybe, or rather, most likely, in a few years or a decade, a new style, a new athletic giant HWT will come along and be even better.

 

All his pre-Sanders fights were pretty cool....back then he was flashier, more aggressive, and took more risks. I have enjoyed most of his comeback fights though. I won a lot of money on him when he fought Sam Peter because of the 4 to 1 odds in Peter's favor, but he looked pretty shaky some of the time...though it was an impressive comeback win his legs reacted strange ....and he seemed to have some trouble controling his nerves. His last few fights have been pretty impressive, the nerves are in full control, his tactics are incredibly hard to defeat, and he seems to be coming into his full physical prime at the precise time that his experience level and ring maturity are fully developed. If he continues to maintain his obviously supreme level of dedication it is hard to visualize him losing to anyone on the horizon for several more years. Conceivably he could make close to as many title defenses as Larry Holmes or Joe Louis before retiring or eventually losing to a young gunner.

 

Dino Davis-talk about crap.

 

You tend to forget that it takes two to tango. It was not Wladimir's fault that Ibragimov was very cautious. I do not see critisism of Ibragimov's tactics. You pick to aim your hatred towards Wladimir because you are afraid of his complete dominance of the heavyweight division for the last years. You are afraid. And you are afraid that this dominance will continue.