Why do so many underrate pac's win over hatton?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by VanillaKilla, Jul 3, 2009.


  1. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee Loyal Member

    44,700
    12,720
    Mar 5, 2006
    looked like the same ricky to me. both share the same birthdate, the same grab and hold technique one was 26 and the other was 30. same age as pacquiao. the only thing they didn't share was the BS referee, the homecourt advantage and that Pac wasn't a little past prime unlike KT.

    Good win by Hatton, an even more memoriable loss from Pacquiao though.
     
  2. VanillaKilla

    VanillaKilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,611
    1
    Oct 31, 2008
    Wrong...

    If youve actually boxed before, your eye would notice that all of the "big shots" tszyu hit hatton with were glancing or he wasnt able to get proper leverage on them. Dont get me wrong. hats off to billy grahm and hatton for thinking of a good gameplan. but hell no, tszyu did not land big shots on hatton. Hatton would be on the canvas if so. :tired
     
  3. snell

    snell FEU-NRMF Full Member

    1,286
    0
    Jun 2, 2009

    this is the problem everytime pac ended his fight early or dominated it.
     
  4. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    Everyone now knows that Pac fights his opponents either at a contracted weight/catch weight, a fighter who has been in many wars, or a "past it" guy. The jig is up with true fans.
     
  5. JuanMa

    JuanMa business as usual Full Member

    3,448
    0
    Jun 26, 2009
    He took Hatton out in devastating fashion in Hatton's own weight class nothing to underrate here that's the way i see it.
     
  6. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,422
    1,681
    Nov 20, 2007
    It was the best overall performance of Pac's career, and one of the shortest annihilations on the elite level of the past decade. Hatton, the true ruler of a high division for Pac, also a top10 P4P-er was flattened in stunning fashion.

    Really a top quality, super-impressive elite victory, nothing like drained Oscar or crowned-by-politics David Diaz. Anyone not giving proper credit should log out and never come back.
     
  7. Ricky369

    Ricky369 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,468
    144
    Feb 16, 2008
    I never had Hatton on my Top 50 boxer list. :tired
     
  8. Losfer_Words

    Losfer_Words Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,385
    1
    May 30, 2009
    In all honesty, this is probably the first time I've seen it mentioned that Pacman's victory over Hatton is underrated. He gets pleanty of credit, don't worry about that. He also deserves every bit of that credit as he stuck to the perfect gameplan and made Hatton taste the canvass 3 times in two rounds.
     
  9. GalangK

    GalangK Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,808
    0
    Oct 3, 2004
    if its underrated it was because it he did it with too much ease. Had he struggled a bit in the early rounds and then ko'd him in the tenth like what Marquez did to Diaz then he might have gotten a bit more.

    Does it make sense? Nope. That's just how it is I suppose.
     
  10. pngo

    pngo #1Contender Full Member

    7,543
    1
    Apr 24, 2007
    Underrate?! wtf are you talking about seriously, after that win people are now putting Pacquiao in the top 30 and top 20 ATG list, this win is getting too ****ing overrated.
    Hatton was always overrated and would always lose against top prime fighters.
     
  11. redifish

    redifish Active Member Full Member

    956
    0
    Dec 7, 2008
    How many of his opponents fought him at a "contracted/catch weight"? DLH? Who else? Moron.
     
  12. LastQuark

    LastQuark Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,928
    0
    Apr 29, 2006
    Didn't Hatton himself said he is better than the old Hatton and could beat Floyd Jr had he known Floyd Sr earlier? He is so confident of the win that he said to his fans right in the eyes that they will not leave home disappointed. The Hatton that fought Pac is technically better than the Hatton that fought KT. Hatton tried to bully Pac but Pac didn't allow it. KT did.

    There are intangibles in the Pac-Hatton fight that were not given credit.

    1. Look at how tight Pac hugged Hatton tight to his chest that prevented him from throwing his signature short left or right hook to the body. As soon as Pac releases him, he is like 2 steps away very quick. This resulted to Hatton hitting Pac at the back of the head a lot of times.

    2. Look how Pac walked (pushed) Hatton to the center of the ring while locked in together. This is the reason why Pac hardly got trapped at the ropes.

    3. Look at how Pac avoided Hattons shots with impressive head movement WHILE giving out a shot! Pac does not avoid throws by Hatton by bending backwards ala Mayweather Jr. He bends down forward instead and does a quick one step allowing himself to get into position for a quick counter.
     
  13. bernie4366

    bernie4366 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,681
    22
    Aug 29, 2006
    I don't think there has ever been a day when Hatton is competitive with the Manny that showed up for that fight. Hatton wasn't at his best, but he wasn't that far from it. He just got blasted out of there by a far superior fighter, simple as that.
     
  14. bernie4366

    bernie4366 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,681
    22
    Aug 29, 2006
    quoted for truth. KT also had old legs, and was content to infight on the ropes when he should have done what Pac did, push him back to the center of the ring.
     
  15. radab

    radab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,721
    1
    Dec 14, 2008
    its not hard to under rate a win over a guy who was nearly stopped by juan lazcano