Sky To Increase Boxing Coverage

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by rezzer, Jul 5, 2009.


  1. rezzer

    rezzer Active Member Full Member

    1,209
    1,436
    Feb 11, 2009
    Just read in today's Sunday Mirror that Sky are to increase their boxing coverage from September. It's in the David Haye articule. Has anyone heard anything about this developement?
     
  2. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    42
    Jan 7, 2005
    No, but good news if its true.
     
  3. doug.ie

    doug.ie 'Classic Boxing Society' Full Member

    14,214
    80
    Apr 1, 2008
    unless its more pay per view.
     
  4. T.C.W

    T.C.W Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,127
    1,407
    Jul 20, 2004
    well there is a opening for them to take over the market with ITV AND SENTANTA getting out.
     
  5. dan-b

    dan-b Boxing Junkie banned

    8,859
    0
    Jan 3, 2009
    Sky having the monopoly isn't a good thing. It leaves us at the mercy of Warren and his WBU/IBO/WBF stuff.
     
  6. deebest

    deebest Active Member Full Member

    826
    0
    Apr 24, 2009
    This can only be a good thing. The more boxing available the better. Just as long as they don't try to rip us of with more ppv.
     
  7. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    42
    Jan 7, 2005
    Aside from getting the big American fights I wish they'd sort out those shitty Friday night domestic cards. I'm a boxing fan but most weeks even I can't be arsed watching most of them past the main event.
     
  8. dan-b

    dan-b Boxing Junkie banned

    8,859
    0
    Jan 3, 2009
    ^ They have been very boring.
     
  9. 'Ben'

    'Ben' Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,307
    1
    Mar 8, 2009

    Sky has a strict policy of not allowing alphabet titles to become main events. One thing I respect Sky for doing. They have too be genuine world titles or British, Commonwealth or European title fights for them to show you.
     
  10. dan-b

    dan-b Boxing Junkie banned

    8,859
    0
    Jan 3, 2009
    As long as they stick to that policy it should be okay then. They need to make the promoters get a little more creative with their matchmaking also. Let's have some American prospects over rather than the staple diet of Eastern bloc and Afro-bum fighters.
     
  11. TIGEREDGE

    TIGEREDGE Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,620
    33
    Mar 10, 2007

    last year i used to look forward to the friday night fights. most of them were even money competive fights. this year it seems to massive favs fighting cannon fodder
     
  12. alba

    alba Guess who? Full Member

    11,185
    2
    Jun 13, 2008

    i fairness to warren when was there last a WBU fight on one of his card?
     
  13. Losfer_Words

    Losfer_Words Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,385
    1
    May 30, 2009
    This is obviously a good thing for us fans as long as it doesn't serve as a platform for even more PPV. It seems pretty obvous now that they intend to strike up a deal with Hayemaker ^^ and seeming as Fury was on their website the other day, maybe the Hennessey deal as well. More shite coverage on the way before the fights if they were to get those deals, though; I've never been a fan of their studio and build up package.
     
  14. dan-b

    dan-b Boxing Junkie banned

    8,859
    0
    Jan 3, 2009
    Not for a while but if the 'increase' in boxing means more Warren cards he maybe tempted to fill them out with those kinds of title fights.
     
  15. Losfer_Words

    Losfer_Words Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,385
    1
    May 30, 2009
    Wasn't the fight between Matthews and Choi promoted by Warren? That was a WBU 'title' fight. Also, Hatton proudly held the WBU strap for ages, under the watchful eye of Fish Eyes, before he got hold of Tszyu's IBF strap.