Marciano vs Frazier

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by PetethePrince, Jun 29, 2009.


  1. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    I'm not sure if I'm even going to respond to hegrants post. For now, I shall post something else. The more and more research I do the more it seems his chin is slightly overrated.

    In Frazier's second fight he was down against Mike Bruce for an 8 count in round 1. Mike Bruce was a nobody bum http://www.boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_id=16110&cat=boxer

    Now, I'll take Marciano going down for a 3 count against an ATG Heavyweight that floored Joe Louis 3 times versus Frazier who got knocked down by a guy who had 10 wins and 30 loses in his career. Face it, Joe's durability was majorly exposed by Foreman and his chin is overrated. When people are under the impression that Frazier has a better chin than Marciano, either Marciano's chin gets underrated or Frazier chin gets a little overrated. Take your pick.

    It's starting to become more clear. Marciano takes this one with more and more thinking.
     
  2. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,599
    27,272
    Feb 15, 2006
    I think the opposite is true to be honest.

    Some people can never forgive Marciano for being an udefeated white heavyweight champion. While I do not include anybody posting in this thread among this element you would find on an unmoderated forum a lot of people who are obsesivley vitriolic about Marciano. They come here from time to time but inevitably fall foul of the moderators.

    At the end of the day Marciano is what he is. A small heavyweight with a swarming style and a track record of performing better than contemporary observers anticipated against aparently more skilled oponents. His record on paper clearly puts him among the upper echelon of heavyweight champions.

    I don't think that even his most vheament suporters on this site have tried to claim that he is the greatest heavyweight of all time or even the second best. This fact is routinely overlooked by his critics.
     
  3. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,456
    9,437
    Jul 15, 2008
    How high in the upper echelon of heavyweight champions do you rate him?
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,044
    48,167
    Mar 21, 2007
    Frazier #5, Marciano #9.
     
  5. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    I know you aren't asking me. But I have Marciano #3 and I have Frazier #5. Both top 5's for me.
     
  6. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,599
    27,272
    Feb 15, 2006
    I personaly have him at #6.

    He has six defences of the lineal title and five of those were against the No1 ranked ring magazine contender. On this basis alone his title reign would compare to that of Jeffries Dempsey Tyson or Lewis by a conservative estimate.

    Many criticise the level of his competition but the reality is that verry few great heavyweights primes overlap with the primes of other great heavyweights. The best guys Marciano beat are prety much as good as it gets outside the 70s.

    Add the fact that there is no defeat to blemish his record and how many champions can be clearly ranked ahead of him. Ali and Louis take it based on longevity and depth but after that the field is wide open.
     
  7. dezbeast

    dezbeast Active Member Full Member

    552
    5
    Mar 1, 2009
    I come to all my analysis by leaving out emotion (critisizing my favorite fighters, supporting fighters I dislike), analyzing fight films, factoring certain data (too many to list), the rest I basically rely on my intuition, especially if the data gets too overwhelming for me. You don't have to question my objectivity at all.

    In case you don't know, I rate strickly on H2H abilities alone. So Marciano and Frazier don't even make it on my top 20 list. My favorite fighter is Ali.
     
  8. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    Phew, not even top 20 H2H? That's harsh. I haven't made an H2H list but my Top 10-15 list is non-bearing of H2H because I can't exactly speculate or prove that he beats him and such. All I can do is view their own greatness comparably to the others. I have a criteria for it, though, that I feel is fair.

    I leave emotion out of my criteria too. I wonder how you come to grips believing Frazier had the superior chin and more balanced power. Guess we will have to just agree to disagree. If we can't even agree on their assets/disadvantages then we can't analyze the fantasy matchup properly.

    And I feel I'm at a fine position questioning your objectivity. I really found your white champion post to be semi-insulting/ridiculous. Marciano will always have his detractors and will always have his skills underrated - even big time historians will misunderstand and mis-represent him from time time. A lot people appreciate him for the toughness, heart, and hard work. That's enough respect I guess, but as that undefeated 49-0 fighter he will always be looked down upon and looked as fighting in a weak era and having a weak resume. Partly true, mostly fiction, usually exaggerated.
     
  9. dezbeast

    dezbeast Active Member Full Member

    552
    5
    Mar 1, 2009
    Woah, woah that wasn't me that made that white champion post. On another note do you recommend any Rocky fights demonstrating his chin the best?
     
  10. hhascup

    hhascup Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,685
    177
    Dec 27, 2006

    Walcott was 10-7 going into his bout with Rocky, you really think that was in his prime.

    Moore was stopped by Patterson in 5 rounds. After being KO'ed by Rocky, Moore went 11-0 with 8 KO's so that bout had nothing to do with being stopped by 21 year old Patterson.
     
  11. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    LoL sorry. I'm getting way way lost in all these posts/posters. My bad.

    As for Rocky and his chin. I would say his fight with Jersey Joe (The first one) displays his chin. Hopefully you can watch or pick up a good quality version. The fight is on youtube. I have ESPN RIngside Top 10 Heavyweights (Pretty good buy) and the announcer for the fight talked about the fight and how Jersey was a good heavyweight. He said he thought Rocky took such a beating in the 12th round that he wouldn't come out for the 13th. I would also check out the Louis v Marciano fight. Yes, it's an old Louis and he doesn't have the same reflexes, timing, or speed but power is the last thing to go and catches Marciano coming in a bit. The LaStarza II is a good one to check Rocky just go forward and take shots without being fazed, but LaStarza really wasn't a good or big puncher. I'd say your next best bet might be Rocky v Moore. Marciano shows some good toughness and recuperation. I do believe he gets dropped largely from being off balanced but he seemed to be slightly hurt. Towards the end you can see Marciano throwing bombs on Archie who is on the ropes and Archie occasionally throws punches back. You can see even in big exchanges Rocky using defense and head movement, you can also see him just take shots and keep coming without it fazing him. Pretty good stuff. I have the Moore fight... there's also a good 20 minute sectioned highlight of the fight on youtube. I could hook you up with links or something.
     
  12. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    You get caught up way too much on facts and figures rather the context of things. Walcott had a lot of wars and fights with good fighters. He fought mostly Louis, Charles, Ray, and Maxim. Most he won, and he lost the Louis fight to a bad decision. Moore's fight against Patterson was one of his worst showing. He admit later in his life that it was his worst fight. Patterson was too fast and much for Moore either way but he would've faired better. Stylistically, it wasn't a great matchup either way. It was also one of Patterson's best performance. Got to factor these things in...

    And the poster said Walcott was closer to his prime than Charles was, which is true.
     
  13. yancey

    yancey Active Member Full Member

    1,487
    58
    Nov 28, 2007
    Hey Pete, shouldn't he see the Cockell fight, too?

    I think it is also on youtube.
     
  14. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    Ah good call. That's good for the first few rounds to show Marciano's chin. Eventually Cockell tires and he just tries surviving. I don't think that fights on youtube though (Maybe a highlight). Probably didn't bring it up because it's one of Rocky's worst performances and Moore and Jersey Joe are much better opposition and better punchers.

    Found the highlight, good commentating. Cockell survives some brutal shots. He becomes really bewildered. Highlights late rounds and just Marciano on the attack. Not much to show you his chin here, and it's a hard fight to find. You can read up on it I guess. But go with the Walcott I, Louis, and Moore fights. That will you enough.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8d9OoCj89ok
     
  15. groove

    groove Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,056
    26
    May 16, 2006
    Frazier is seriously underrated on this board. he fought ali who could defeat anyone in the history of heavyweights and then he fought foreman who was at his peak. walcott and charles would be gone like frazier if they fought him that day in jan 73. actually i would be hard pressed to call anyone other than ali that could beat george in zaire. easy in hindsight but he was a monster at that time. ali was smart. frazier, tyson and the likes aren;t nearly as smart. i rate tunney high cuz he was as smart as ali and could adapt.