Macklin leaves Warren for Hatton!

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by robpalmer135, Jul 6, 2009.


  1. robpalmer135

    robpalmer135 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,342
    0
    Jun 29, 2007
    rumours flying round on other forums.
     
  2. icemax

    icemax Indian Red Full Member

    27,158
    2
    Apr 24, 2008
    That would be quite a story, and a real coup for Hatton Promotions
     
  3. mossy141

    mossy141 Active Member Full Member

    905
    0
    Apr 8, 2009
    if its true it is a very stupid change imo
     
  4. LHL

    LHL Captain Freedom Full Member

    23,826
    3
    Oct 27, 2008
    Good for Hatton strange from Macklin. This will probably help the Barker fight though which is something that i have been waiting for.
     
  5. icemax

    icemax Indian Red Full Member

    27,158
    2
    Apr 24, 2008
    Its not often on here we hear someone being called stupid for leaving Warren ...I don't necessarily disagree with you :good
     
  6. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    Hmmmm.......

    I don't think Warren is that interested in Macklin to be perfectly honest, and he needs to be getting a move on rather than hanging around.

    Hatton will be more likely to co-operate with other promoters than Warren will, so bigger and better fights (those that we want to see) are likely to be on the horizon.
     
  7. chrisfinch

    chrisfinch Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,270
    795
    Mar 21, 2009
    I'd tend to agree, but this year we've already seen Macklin v Elcock and Cleverly v McIntosh is upcoming, so I think Barker v Macklin would definitely have been made, most likely main eventing a Hennessy show (provided they are still on itv4 at that point).

    Surprisng really, but if Matthew thinks its for the best, fair play to him.
     
  8. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    Yeah but those fights were mandatory.... unless Barker has been made mando for the British title (I aren't sure).

    Macklin has fought enough meaningless eight/ten rounders on undercards somewhere, nearly as many as John Duddy - time to get a move on and see what he can actually do.
     
  9. EireFightFan

    EireFightFan Active Member Full Member

    612
    0
    Mar 25, 2009
    A strange one alright, He and Hatton are very close so I wonder if this decision was made more with his heart than his head. He has a habit of changing trainers a lot too which is worrying as consistancy is a very important to a fighter.

    But I agree that Macklin didn't appear to be high on Warren's list of priorities and Hatton's affiliation with Golden Boy might open a few doors for Macklin stateside.

    Time will tell....
     
  10. chrisfinch

    chrisfinch Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,270
    795
    Mar 21, 2009
    Good point, I knew Cleverly was mandatory but wasnt sure about the Elcock/Macklin fight. I think Barker is the mandatory for the British though, his most recent CW title fight doubled as a final eliminator.
     
  11. alba

    alba Guess who? Full Member

    11,185
    2
    Jun 13, 2008

    old,old news rob .
     
  12. robpalmer135

    robpalmer135 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,342
    0
    Jun 29, 2007
    well everyone else thats posted on here seems suprised.

    Barker is Macklins mandatory, purse bids are this week.
     
  13. rooq

    rooq Rooq's Boxing Promoter Full Member

    12,353
    0
    Jan 16, 2007
    under warren, mackling would turn into another jennings
     
  14. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    Waste his potential fighting clowns, then getting a lucky title shot and getting beaten up because you lacked big fight experience?

    (Not that Jennings would ever beat Cotto - btw)
     
  15. rooq

    rooq Rooq's Boxing Promoter Full Member

    12,353
    0
    Jan 16, 2007
    pretty much.

    he'd never be one of his main stars