Complete Fighters

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by EireFightFan, Jul 6, 2009.


  1. EireFightFan

    EireFightFan Active Member Full Member

    612
    0
    Mar 25, 2009
    I'm not trying to start another P4P denate here. I would like to hear the Classic Forum's opinions on which fighters stand up as examples of the complete fighter and what it takes to be considered as such.

    Obviously there are the prerequisites of an excellent resumé, natural talent, skills both in attack and defense, Power, Heart, Mentality/Ring-smarts, and a good chin but also the intangibles of charisma, as well as a crowd pleasing and entertaining style.

    My own limited knowledge on the subject has brought me the following list off the top of my head, feel free to disagree: SRRobinson, Ali, JCC, Benny Leonard, Salvador Sanchez, SRLeonard, & Arguello. Of today's fighters: Pacquiao.

    Other examples please...
     
  2. OBCboxer

    OBCboxer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,949
    226
    Jun 2, 2007
  3. stevebhoy87

    stevebhoy87 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,304
    5
    Dec 7, 2007
    Wlfredo gomez pre sanchez at 122 was as compete as the come, olivares at 118. ricardo lopez deserves a mention as well
     
  4. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    Sugar Ray Leonard at 147.
     
  5. MagnificentMatt

    MagnificentMatt Beterbiev literally kills Plant and McCumby 2v1 Full Member

    4,634
    2,294
    Nov 11, 2006
    Marvin Hagler, Pernell Whitaker.
     
  6. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    Whitaker didn't really have power, and as great as he was, can we really consider him complete without it?
     
  7. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    62,013
    46,875
    Feb 11, 2005
    Joe Gans, Ricardo Lopez, Julio Cesar Chavez, Sugar Ray Leonard (wow, that hurt to admit), Sugar Ray Robinson, Joe Louis, Pernell Whitaker, Benny Leonard, Sam Langford, prime Mike Tyson, Gene Tunney, Jose Napoles, Arguello, Charley Burley, Marvin Hagler, Joe Calzaghe...
     
  8. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    62,013
    46,875
    Feb 11, 2005
    Pernell sat down on his punches later in his career and if not KO'ing guys in the first, he was stinging them and keeping them honest. Throughout his career, he used his power to very good effect. It was an integral part of his effectiveness when mixed with his other fantastic attributes.
     
  9. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,221
    173
    Jul 23, 2004
    Yes. Complete to me is could they do everything within the ropes on a regular basis. Knocking someone out is the end result of a punch landing. Some fighters don't have chilling power. Whitaker IMO is more complete than Leonard as a fighter. Better balanced across the board. A better pure boxer, better defense, and offensively just as good apart from the end result of knocking an opponent out. Whitaker was a great offensive fighter, no question. It's just because he never had power that his offense is forgotten about.
     
  10. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,221
    173
    Jul 23, 2004
    I'll say Hagler.
     
  11. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    Alright then, for me completeness is a stylistic thing, like Robbi says, they have a bit of everything in their locker, an 'all-rounder', not a pure boxer and definitely not a one dimensional slugger. I like Hagler here, though a bit like Hopkins he tended to be one or the other depending on what segment of his career you look at. But that would be a bit harsh i admit, even at the end of his career Hagler could adapt well, and was a switch hitter, very nice.

    Yoko Gushiken

    Carlos Ortiz

    Marco Antonio Barrera
     
  12. MagnificentMatt

    MagnificentMatt Beterbiev literally kills Plant and McCumby 2v1 Full Member

    4,634
    2,294
    Nov 11, 2006
    Pernell had enough power to get respect, and he was also an underrated body puncher...Just because his KO% doesnt high doesnt mean hes "feather-fisted".. Crazy how someone who rarely threw under 80 punches get their offense over looked so often... I guess thats what happens when their defense leaves you in awe. haha
     
  13. laxpdx

    laxpdx Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,921
    77
    Oct 1, 2006
    Napoles, Duran
     
  14. Dempsey08

    Dempsey08 New Member Full Member

    76
    0
    Jul 24, 2008
  15. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,221
    173
    Jul 23, 2004
    Duran's long range ability is somewhat limited. Great at coming forward behind long range punches, yes, but very limited at boxing strictly at long range. He wasn't great at backing-up and throwing at the same time. Whitaker could punch coming forward, laterally or going backwards. He's a more complete fighter in my eyes. IMO, Whitaker was a better aggressive/brawler type than Duran was a boxer.

    I'll finish with this, both were very complete.