Prime Tony Tucker vs Prime Chagaev: Proof that this is a weak era.

Ok, now i know you know ****,,,NO, NO, NO, chagaev is not as good as tyson, not close, i think chagaev would of been a nice test for tyson, an think he is as good as mercer, but NO, not tyson,,,I was trying to say, tyson was pretty much in his chest the whole fight, so i have to believe, chagaev would have a good chance of being in there enough to win the fight,,,keep in mind tucker does not have wlad jab or straight right, an that is what kept chageav at bay

 

Chagaev is a better fighter than Tucker man.

 

Tucker at his best was certinly better.

 

Even though I've put an idiot proof film analysis that proves that he is clearly not unless you define better as being, slower, weaker, and less skilled.

If that's the case, then I would have to agree with you.

It takes a man to admit when he's wrong...

Tucker was a good fighter that would be good in any era. You can see that by watching him fight...

The same cannot be said about Chagaev.

 

Man, this guy is the one that inspired me to make this thread in the first place.

He's not gonna retract what he said no matter what you put in front of his face and how obviously apparent it is...

So don't stress...

 

I say Tucker by UD, but that doesnt mean Chagaev is no good.

Also i like the choice of videos you showed for each fighter, very unbiased.

 

I'm not sure if you are being sarcastic, but I chose a guy that was very similiar to Wlad and a guy that was at least somewhat similiar to Chagaev.