Muay Thai fighter vs Boxer?

Discussion in 'MMA Forum' started by TheStraightLeft, Jul 6, 2009.


  1. jimmie

    jimmie Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,706
    1
    Jul 19, 2004
    Alot of people call it a push kick or front kick and when I say those you will know exactly what I mean. Most Thai fighters and trainers call it footjab or teep but obviously it has like 10 names. I think teeps might be the best way to neutrlize a good boxer.
     
  2. TheStraightLeft

    TheStraightLeft New Member Full Member

    0
    0
    Apr 10, 2009
    Ah yes I know what they are. I've never heard it called teeps before. Is it short for something?
     
  3. jimmie

    jimmie Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,706
    1
    Jul 19, 2004
    Honestly not sure man theres always weird names for **** in martial arts.
     
  4. cdnboxing

    cdnboxing Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,638
    0
    Jun 20, 2008
    Arthur wasnt a good boxer, and was way past his prime.

    The bottom line is, just because a MT fighter has more tools at his disposal does not mean he will beat the boxer.

    The examples of Muay Thai > Boxing are just beyond stupid and is just grasping at straws. All of those examples feature either terrible boxers, past their prime boxers or boxers simply showing up for a paycheque in a dirty, corrupt fighting organization in Japan. Some examples are all of the above.

    The bottom line is boxers posess terrific weapons, weapons that a MT fighter would have never seen before. Boxers also have a tremendous grasp of ring generalship, footwork, angles etc which the MT fighter would have most likely never seen before. Kicks arent a boxers kryptonite. The fact people think boxers just crumble from a couple low kicks is just stupid. The talent pool in boxing is also lightyears ahead of that in Muay Thai therefore its logical to assume that the elite in boxing are far greater athletically and far more battle tested.

    In my opinion, the best of the best in MT would beat the best of the best in boxing in MT rules. However, it would be fairly competitive. Also, there would be very few MT fighters who could beat elite boxers and im almost certain that those elite boxers would steamroll right through the shallow MT talent pool.

    Extreme Couture striking coach, Shawn Tompkins said wrestling and boxing are the hardest things to learn but once you learn those, you can learn MT and BJJ along the way. You can draw your own conclusions from that.
     
  5. OuterDrake

    OuterDrake Guest

    I recall a 40 year old washed up Francois Botha beating on Jerome LeBanner.
     
  6. TheStraightLeft

    TheStraightLeft New Member Full Member

    0
    0
    Apr 10, 2009
    What do you mean 'weapons that a MT fighter would have never seen before'? The MT fighter's arsenal includes everything that the boxer has - the straight/cross, jab, uppercut, and hooks are all in the MT's arsenal as well.

    It should be the other way round, that the MT fighter has more weapons that a boxer has never seen before. The boxer isn't used to dealing with kicks, elbows, knees, stand up grappling/throws with strikes.

    The MT fighters also have a tremendous grasp of ring generalship, footwork, and angles. The approach of the MT fighter is something which a boxer is not exposed to in the sport of boxing either.

    The MT fighters in Thailand dominate in their weight classes which is generally in the mid to lower weight ranges. The Dutch generally dominate in the upper weight classes simply because genetically they are larger people. There is a large talent pool in MT.
     
  7. HeavyT

    HeavyT Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,709
    19
    Feb 9, 2009
    :deal
     
  8. Wilhelm

    Wilhelm Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,914
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    I go to a kickboxing/martial arts gym, and guys that I can totally own in boxing can clean my clock when kicks are allowed. As I always say in the stupid "MMA fighter vs boxer" threads, anyone who thinks boxing is going to be more successful more often than grappling just needs to TRY IT FOR THEMSELVES. Average against average, great against great, kickboxers will beat boxers way more often than the other way around. Try it and let me know if I'm wrong.
     
  9. cdnboxing

    cdnboxing Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,638
    0
    Jun 20, 2008
    There are far more participants worldwide in boxing than any other combat sport.
     
  10. cdnboxing

    cdnboxing Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,638
    0
    Jun 20, 2008
    I think the point is that boxers always have a legitimate shot.

    MT fighter in boxing against elite fighters dont have a shot at all.
     
  11. Wilhelm

    Wilhelm Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,914
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    I guess it depends on what you're definition of "legitimate" is. If the MT fighter is smart (in a MT match with a boxer), he'll keep the boxer off them and break them down with techniques the boxer isn't used to. If he doesn't and just goes in punching, he could lose. In the same fashion, a smart boxer (in a boxing match with a MT fighter) would use his advanates (not so square, use of the shoulder for defense, better use of the elbows to block body shots etc) and not just square up inside and slug it out. If he does, he could lose.

    Also, I don't understand why you criticize the kickboxer vs boxer matchups on the grounds that the boxers "aren't good enough to count". If great boxers should beat great kickboxers, shouldn't mediocore boxers beat mediocore kickboxers?

    The way I see it, this whole thing boils down to whether or not you learn a few more techniques at the expense of learning fewer ones better; that somone (you, perhaps) would say that learning to kickbox (take Thai or American or Savate or whatever) and learning that would leave you LESS prepared for a fight than if you just worked on punching. What is it that you see as the inherent problem with kicking in a combat sport?
     
  12. Saber120

    Saber120 New Member Full Member

    72
    0
    Jul 23, 2004
    I wouldnt say its average kickboxer against average boxer. Botha almost got his head tore off by lennox in 1+half rounds when he was at his boxing best and just because he was neck and neck on points with old tart tyson until tyson knocked him out with 1 punch people think he is decent. Top level Kickboxers couldnt take him out even with headkicks in 3 rounds I dont think he was good at all. Ray mercer was way over it when he went to K1. He got his arse kicked easily by wlad. Dont even know who the hell aurther williams is...not only that but boxrec said he is a cruiser not a heavy. Vince philips was getting Koed in boxing thats why he left and got koed by masato.

    I think some kickboxers rely to much on a stonewall defence against punches. Even some of the good ones like John Wayne Parr. Without gloves or wearing MMA gloves all your gonna be doing is testing your chin with that defence. Jwp had a MMA fight and he got drilled down the center of his stonewall guard easily and flinched from the pain then taken down. A boxer would need the right style to beat a kickboxer in a kick rules fight. Oviously good power will make his punches more decisive.

    No gloves would make the hands way more decisive. Not only power but the hands are faster and harder to see coming and its very difficult to rely on blocks. Thats why there where maimings, deaths and broken bones back in the early days with the 5oz horse hair gloves and even rocky and louis could break peoples arms, knock teeth out and smash vertabra with the 8oz horse hair. Early day boxing was more realistic because of the gloves, they didnt use stonewall or peek a boo guard so much they had to parry or catch punches or evade. In the bare knuckle days peoples eyeballs could come out.

    Clearly a Boxer would do well to get proper prep for a kickboxing fight to learn some basic defences and get used to other "tools" coming at him or at least get some conditioning.

    Respect to both styles.
     
  13. cdnboxing

    cdnboxing Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,638
    0
    Jun 20, 2008
    Good post. But the boxers that went over didnt fight mediocre kickboxers. And the boxers themselves were way past their prime, old, washed up or frankly not even that good.
     
  14. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    28
    Jul 21, 2004
    It is all about who executes their art better. Styles v styles is always open. No one style is superior.
     
  15. TheStraightLeft

    TheStraightLeft New Member Full Member

    0
    0
    Apr 10, 2009
    I like the way you think, mate. I agree what you're saying there.


    I agree with this too, which is why I wonder why there is such a disparity between the kickboxer and mma fighter as opponents for the boxer. Don't get me wrong, I love boxing and I believe that boxers who take the time to train with non-boxers will be far more prepared when facing non-boxing opponents.

    This being a boxing forum, there is marginally more respect for the muay thai fighter than there is for an mma fighter. Possibly because the muay thai fighter is also a striking specialist and the boxers in this forum can better relate to them? Therefore the boxers in this forum aren't as shy about giving them a bit more respect?

    Generally speaking my view on this is that while a kickboxer will fight toe to toe with the boxer, the mma fighter or grappler will take advantage of the stand up striker's disadvantages, ie. no grappling or ground work. The mma/grappler's strategy would therefore be to theoretically neutralise the boxer's strengths by taking him straight to the ground. Is that what the problem is for the boxers in this forum?