PAC vs JMM 3 at 144 lbs., who wins?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by buxzer, Jul 10, 2009.


  1. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,566
    18,253
    Oct 7, 2006

    No, the thread is ******ed because JMM hasn't fought above 135 yet. Once we see him against PBF then we can give an accurate assesment.

    If you had a third option that read, "undecided untill we see him vs Floyd" it wouldn't be that *******ed, but the fact that you didn't include that option makes this thread stupid.
     
  2. buxzer

    buxzer Eastern Champ Full Member

    6,107
    0
    Oct 4, 2008

    So you mean you don't have any opinion/idea/pick whatsoever on the forthcoming PBF vs. JMM fight because it will be at 144 lbs. (above 135)?? I'm confused here...

    Fantasy match ups are more difficult than the scenario that I wanted to be discussed here yet fantasy match up threads were not considered stupid threads...
    .
     
  3. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,566
    18,253
    Oct 7, 2006
    :patsch

    Of course your confused, you only understand things through Pacatrd glasses.

    How can we say who wins when we don't know even know how he will do vs PBF.

    Seriously dude, read what your asking. How about asking like this, if JMM looks like crap vs PBF who wins? or If JMM looks great vs PBF but still loses, or if JMM beats PBF who wins.

    Those are questions a true fight fan would ask, not a ******* question like yours. :patsch
     
  4. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,566
    18,253
    Oct 7, 2006
    I think JMM has a chance, but considering that we never seen JMM above 135 how the hell am I supposed to give an accurate assesment?

    I'll tell u this much, JMM should be the under-dog as he has more things playing against him vs PBF. Again, rwead my previous post and learn a thing or two.
     
  5. itrymariti

    itrymariti CaƱas! Full Member

    13,728
    47
    Sep 6, 2008
    They wouldn't fight at 144 for starters. The question is: how will the weight difference affect JMM? Remember they fought at 130 the last time, so even 140 is a substantial difference. We've seen that Pacquiao can handle the weight, and looks just as sharp, and probably even stronger. I'm not sure that JMM can, and he even looked less elusive and willing to back up in straight lines against Diaz. Certainly, Pacquiao's left hand will be a lot more effective when it lands. I'd favour Pacquiao; but, again, it all depends on the weight.
     
  6. lern1079

    lern1079 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,978
    0
    Feb 3, 2005
    They are retiring because they are not in their primes and much closer to retirement...lol. Yeah you did Pac a great service by saying this.

    JMM KO'ed one fighter that was close to retirement and that is Joel Casamayor. Juan Diaz was more in his prime than either DLH or Hatton.

    Nobody was bragging just stating counter argument.
     
  7. buxzer

    buxzer Eastern Champ Full Member

    6,107
    0
    Oct 4, 2008

    There you go.... If you can say JMM has a chance against PBF even if he's a heavy underdog then you can also say the same thing for PAC vs. JMM 3 at 144 lbs.

    You assessment may not be that accurate (btw, how many times you've given one here?), I'm just asking for your opinion on who you think will win in a PAC vs. JMM 3 fight at 144 lbs.
    .
    .
     
  8. lern1079

    lern1079 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,978
    0
    Feb 3, 2005
    But what makes you think that Marquez is even thinking this? Maybe he is just an athlete trying to push his own limits.
     
  9. DLSC

    DLSC Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,243
    0
    Jun 20, 2009
    Putting aside what happened in the past, in my opinion, Pac will beat JMM @ 140 or 144. :bbb
     
  10. lern1079

    lern1079 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,978
    0
    Feb 3, 2005
    No I don't. Look at my post history and tell me that I'm wrong. I don't know how Marquez will perform at that weight.
     
  11. buxzer

    buxzer Eastern Champ Full Member

    6,107
    0
    Oct 4, 2008

    I'm guessing you already have your pick for the PBF-JMM fight... Why don't you share with us your opinion for Cotto vs. JMM at 144 and PAC vs. PBF at 144? Or you want me to post my opinion on these fights first? Just say so...
    .
     
  12. Powerman55

    Powerman55 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,295
    0
    Nov 26, 2008
    It's not a personal attack on Marquez at all. I have huge respect for him especially after putting up the fight he did after 3 knockdowns.

    I'm just saying that he might be naive in thinking he can go up in weight and retain his speed like Pac does. Maybe he doesn't care, maybe he has balls so huge that he's willing to take on Mayweather even if he isn't at his best 100% weight.
     
  13. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    pac and hatton is of the same age and pac has been fighting longer than hatton. does this mean that pac is not in his prime anymore? silly excuses. :patsch
     
  14. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,566
    18,253
    Oct 7, 2006
    buxzer you're such a little *****. :lol: You're ridiculous.

    It's amazing how hard you hug Pac's nuts.

    Your so Pacatarded you don't even realize when you're gettin owned. :patsch
     
  15. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,566
    18,253
    Oct 7, 2006

    Vargas was past his prime at 27 and 6 years as a pro.

    WTF is your point??

    That's the problem with you *******s. you guys all use Pac as a scale to measure everything, but reality is everyone is different. I doubt Pac will be competing liek Hopkins, Mosley and Marquez when he's their age. Do you even understand that?