Umm no hes not ducking Cunningham at all.. What gives you such a silly impression? First of all Cunningham didn't want a immediate rematch at ALL. Sorry but its the truth. Also, the International Boxing Federation (IBF) has a rule since 2008 that a fighter must be coming off a win to fight for a IBF world title. Yea also, I know some fart sniffer is probably gonna come in here and mention Dawson - Tarver II so im going to make this clear for them. Yes your right, but there was a rematch clause in the contract in which the IBF themselves accepted. There was no rematch clause in Adamek vs. Cunningham. Grow the hell up and give credit where its due and stop talking so much bullcrap because honestly your looking like a fool right now. Your man got spanked live with it, i hate it when people discredit awesome fighters like Adamek. If you don't like Adamek honestly, you dont really even like boxing tbh... Cause boxing needs guys like Adamek. He has faught Banks, Cunningham, Gomez, and Bell in his last 4. Those are tough fights so he was due a gimme fight vs somone like Gunn. And also, Gunn was a 5th alternative to the world title, fool. They asked Flores, Godfrey, Hopkins, and Jones and they all fell threw. BJ(he was mando to the IBF) and Godfrey because they are pussies, Hopkins cause of his lowball offer, and Jones only said that to get his name in the papers, thats all. Not Adameks fault he had only Gunn in front of him.. Better staying busy and fighting Gunn (yes it is dont come with me on that "no its not crap because your false) than sitting on his ass and not fighting at all liek Steve did for 1 FULL YEAR after the Huck fight. Get out of here with your garbage son before i embarrass you even more
Nothing stupid about it. Boxers fight the wrong type of fight all the time it happens, look at Victor Ortiz a few weeks ago. It was clear as day that when he chose to box he got the best of Adamek. He should have stuck with that gameplan more and he probably would have won and already close fight.
lol yea of course cuz u got nothin Yea ok, nice little opinion anyways. Staying busy and fighting Gunn is better than that year layoff Steve had. What was up with that huh. Your saying Adamek is ducking Cunningham yea ok, well why didnt he give my boy Wlodarczyk a rematch during that year? Wlodarczyk gave him one and called him out after the second fight and Steve didnt say nothing. Also nothing but excuses when he fought him the first time. :yep Still doesnt change the fact tho. Adamek did more during his 6 month title rein than Steve did in a year. And this is only the 6th month Adamek is champ :yea
He beat Cunningham no doubt about it because Cunningham had horrid defense. Now that Steve has tightend up his "D", he will outbox Adamek and win a comfortable decision. Without one of those KO's he wins that fight; some people still had Steve up a point in the last fight. I think Adamek will fight him and regardless of the result he'll make a move up to heavyweight. I have a feeling Steve will campaign at HW as well.
I know its because of King. Also just because you go to Cunninghams pizza shop and talk to him doesnt mean you know "more than me" Whats happening behind the scenes? Anyways i though you said you werent going to argue with me? Well seems like you are and makes it turn out that you really have nothing to say to this: #[url]47[/url] But im just saying, Adamek already fought 2 contenders Banks and Gunn within 6 months of having the title and all Cunningham did was fight Huck and take a year off. And dont give me that "spar with" crap, Banks would KO Huck. How can you claim yourself as the best CW when all you did was made one defense. Adamek is at least looking for fights.
So i gather from this thread...Steve is untouchable when he decides to Box and he always fights the absolute best available opponent! :thumbsup
So you are saying Steve is being ducked.What about Guillermo or Wlodarczyk?He didnt give either a rematch yet cries foul when he doesnt immediatly get a rematch. Take away the name Braithwaite and you find a fighter who has dropped 4 of his last 6.Dont sit there and tell me he only fights the best when Marco Huck the Boxing caveman was his only succesful title defense.He fought Adamek because HE HAD TO. Shitty stay busy title defenses happen...take a good look at some of your favorite fighters records...NOBODY agrees with BHOP and his jerking around of Adamek..which is why he LIED on air on FNF and claimed he offered $1.2.
Since Cunnigham is considered as legitimate #2 in the division I don't know why is Steve chasing only at IBF belt, he didn't have to fight Braithwite just to earn mandatory spot for IBF he could go after Jones or other belts. Also the IBF requirement for coming of the win did not apply when Cunningham got rematch against Wlodarczyk. The shame on Steve he did not gave Wlodarczyk the same as he have received.
dude you sound like a hater all you do is reapeating the lies , but ill tell u this , u should be very grateful to adamek that he's going to beat ur hero's ass now on the HBo TV(probably) cuz itll be the first time cunninghum appears there and maybe if he gives a good fight he'll get more opportunity's to even show his ass to wide public as his last fight were watching around 200 spectators
I thought he beat Bell in a title eliminator? Banks WAS on TV. Who has Steve beat that makes him some kind of fight anybody warrior? Adamek does chose to fight those guys the only problem is they all dont want to fight him.Flores and Godfrey bitched out.Jones is not active.NO way Huck's handlers allow him to fight Adamek. Since when is Steve this fight everybody give everybody a rematch type fighter?JONES AND WLOD have something to say about that!
BTW why give a guy a rematch right away who claims he got robbed and slipped on a couple of those KD's?
What a stupid question. Maybe because he hast to give him a rematch or he'll be stripped of his title. Cunningham is more than deserving of a rematch.