Prime JOE LOUIS v Prime JACK JOHNSON!!!

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by ClintMagnum, Jun 28, 2009.


  1. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,452
    9,437
    Jul 15, 2008
    I think Johnson confuses him and throws off his rythmn ... Louis would have trouble hitting him. Johnson was strong enough to tie him up and smother him and hit more than hard enough to keep him off ... in many ways a better Walcott ...
     
  2. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    47
    Sep 6, 2008
    Louis by KO, especially if Louis tries to get rid of him early. Stylistically, Louis is a huge problem for JJ.

    Johnson looked like a defensive mastermind against very average opposition, many of whom would simply dive in with a few wild hooks and hope for the best. Louis was a very precise, very patient, very fast puncher who wouldn't have given Johnson any room for counter-punching. He never had to deal with anyone who had the ability of Louis, simple as.

    Also, Johnson was used to being able to manhandle people on the inside - counter them, then tie them up. He outsmarted a lot of brawlers that way. Louis didn't let people just grab onto him. He'd shove them off, then blast them with an upper cut or a short hook then go back into the clinch. Johnson just wouldn't get a let-up, inside or outside.

    Yeah, Louis early KO.
     
  3. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,597
    27,270
    Feb 15, 2006
    It is stange how people overlook this when denigrating the talent of fighters from Blackburns era.

    For my money if you put Jack Blackburns brain in Joe Louis's body you would have the ultimate heavyweight Frankensteins monster.
     
  4. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,452
    9,437
    Jul 15, 2008
    Brilliant!

    Louis' weak point really was that he was not the smnartest fighter that ever lived ... the changes he could not make in a fight had to be drilled into him for the rematch where he excelled because his body could execute.
     
  5. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,769
    46,463
    Feb 11, 2005
    Well put. I think Schemling and Sharkey also have good chances to take Johnson.
     
  6. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,597
    27,270
    Feb 15, 2006
    They probably do but then at least Schmeling would have a shot at taking Louis on the day.
     
  7. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,126
    Jun 2, 2006
    Sharkey was kod by one of the slowest, most inept champions ever.
    And it was accomplished with an uppercut .Jack
    Johnson was an acknowledged master of this punch ,just one of them broke Moran's nose.
    Schmeling? he was kod by wild swinging crude Baer, do you see him outboxing Johnson? If you think he can ko Jack with his right cross ,don't forget that Johnson forecast Louis's demise to this very punch because Joe did not bring his left hand back into position after throwing a jab, it would not connect on Johnson.
     
  8. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,126
    Jun 2, 2006
    UPPERCUT?
    Johnson's was superior to Louis's, why wouldnt it be Jack landing it?
     
  9. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    47
    Sep 6, 2008
    I've only really seen Johnson land uppercuts on people who jumped into him, like I said. He threw it well; I'm sure he'd connect with it. But anyway, Louis snapped people's heads up in the air with those uppercuts, he'd throw it, too. How many guys did he KO with that right uppercut-left hook combo? A fair few. In any case, if it comes down to trading punches, Louis would probably **** Jack up, let's face it.
     
  10. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,597
    27,270
    Feb 15, 2006
    Sharkey could be a handfull for anybody when his head was screwed on and Johnson is probably no exception. I am prety sure he would find a way to loose though.

    Johnson Schmeling would be an interesting matchup. Schmeling had a fine uppercut of his own and he worked largley by inverting the boxing textbook and picking people apart based on how they followed it.
     
  11. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,126
    Jun 2, 2006
    Sharkey was indeed a gifted boxer ,but better than Johnson ? I dont think so.Sharkey lost fights he should have won to guys like Rojas and he was handily outboxed by Loughran in one of their fights. How do you see him beating Jack exactly? Schmeling was a fine fighter, but methodical , I just can't see him beating Johnson.
    Louis might ,many would say he would ,I think Johnson would win ,but I wouldnt put any money on it.
     
  12. Cheese

    Cheese Member Full Member

    276
    4
    Jul 18, 2009
    I Joe had to many weapons for Jack to deal with. Between the combination punching and the power and speed in both hands I don't think Jack could deal with it.
     
  13. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,769
    46,463
    Feb 11, 2005
    Jack ran hot and cold. As a betting man that's why I would put my money on Johnson, as it more often comes down to temperment than any certain skill. Not that Johnson was the most consistent performer- he wasn't close- Sharkey defines mercurial. However, if we get Sharkey on a good day, he beats Johnson more often than not.

    And in regards to the Carnera fight, I still think that was fixed.
     
  14. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    Well within 10 rounds.
     
  15. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,597
    27,270
    Feb 15, 2006