Cotto's belt not on the line

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by lern1079, Jul 21, 2009.


  1. lern1079

    lern1079 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,978
    0
    Feb 3, 2005
  2. truewarrior

    truewarrior Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,284
    0
    Feb 3, 2008
    Last time I heard Cotto won his belt at 147. Why should he defend it if its not at the weight?
     
  3. lern1079

    lern1079 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,978
    0
    Feb 3, 2005
    Yeah but techinically 145 is still within the WW limit.
     
  4. redifish

    redifish Active Member Full Member

    956
    0
    Dec 7, 2008
    Look up "boxing divisions for dummies".
     
  5. ishy

    ishy Loyal Member Full Member

    44,755
    7
    Mar 9, 2008
    Because it's still a welterweight fight. DLH-Hopkins was at something like 156lbs but the MW titles were still on the line.
     
  6. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    At the end of the day, belt or no belt its still Manny Pacquiao vs Miguel Cotto.

    If Pac beats Cotto, its not the belt that will make that more or less of an accomplishment, since it changes absolutely nothing in the ring. Its all for talk. People will argue about wether or not Pacqiuao is a 7 weight champion... but thats not what makes Pac a better or worse fighter.
     
  7. jc

    jc Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,971
    14
    Sep 9, 2004
    I at catch weights, there is enough divisions nowadays to accompany everybody!

    Still this is a great match whether or not the WBO belt is on the line. Seems a bit odd that the WBO would wanna miss out on the type of sanctioning fee that a Cotto - Pac fight will bring!
     
  8. Should be its within the welterweight limit!
     
  9. KayEpps

    KayEpps Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,693
    1
    Jul 25, 2007
    Cotto's belt should be on the line and I'm pretty sure Manny will pay the fee to make sure it's on the line. I don't think it makes a difference since Cotto will end up keeping his belt regardless.
     
  10. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,120
    2,760
    Jul 20, 2004
    Leonard/Hagler was at a catchweight and all belts were on the line, what's different here?
     
  11. bxrfan

    bxrfan Sizzle Full Member

    3,061
    16
    Sep 28, 2007
    :rofl:lol::rofl:patsch:roll:
     
  12. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    There's alot of examples Scar.

    Hopkins/Oscar, Whitaker/Chavez, and more...

    Terry Norris and Meldrick Taylor fought for the WBC LMW title at 151.5lbs
     
  13. dangerousity

    dangerousity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,253
    2,301
    Jan 4, 2005
    The victory would just be that much sweeter to have Pac announced the WW champ. If Pac needs to fight Cotto at 147 for that, he should. Cotto weighed in 146 last fight, dont think gaining 1extra lbs is gonna help Pac anyways.
     
  14. Chiko_Tech

    Chiko_Tech Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,637
    43
    Mar 6, 2006
    Yes i read the news too, at least Cotto have one thing if he loses.
     
  15. BlueApollo

    BlueApollo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,827
    3
    May 19, 2007
    Anyone know exactly what Cotto got in return for putting his belt on the line? Or was this just an assumed part of Manny being willing to make the fight?

    Since the fight isn't going to be at 147, there is no reason the belt should be up for grabs.