Cotto's belt not on the line

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by lern1079, Jul 21, 2009.


  1. quocnam

    quocnam Member Full Member

    347
    0
    Sep 30, 2007
    It does! Champion in 7 different weigh classes is something that NO ONE I know achieve before.
     
  2. istmeno

    istmeno Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,664
    5
    Oct 6, 2006
    which also gives the wbo the option of declaring the belt vacant should cotto lose, as the fight is taking place over 12 rounds and within the ww limit.
     
  3. VanillaKilla

    VanillaKilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,611
    1
    Oct 31, 2008
    hmmm fighting for the welterweight belt... doesn't that mean fighting for a belt were either fighter can come into scales weighing up to 147 pounds if they choose???

    Seems pretty self-explanatory as to why it wouldnt and shouldnt be on the line. You pac dick suckers can insult me or w/e. Too bad you cant insult real logic. :rofl

    Dont worry, we can make pac the new "catchweight" champion :deal

    Btw can anyone remind me of a time when floyd asked for a catchweight?:yep
     
  4. BADINTENTIONS2

    BADINTENTIONS2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,073
    0
    Feb 16, 2008
    to be honest it doesnt matter. bring it on.
     
  5. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    it doesn't because at the end of the day thats only a label, and how good he is is determined by what he does in the ring.
     
  6. Stinky gloves

    Stinky gloves Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,255
    14
    May 31, 2007
    DLH on mind? BTW ... when beside DLH Floyd fought a bigger guy?
     
  7. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    26,390
    2
    Mar 13, 2007
    Stop confusing other posters . . .

    Officially the WBO BELT will be on the line. :deal
     
  8. T.C.W

    T.C.W Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,975
    1,198
    Jul 20, 2004
    who cares about the silly belts
     
  9. Ricky369

    Ricky369 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,468
    144
    Feb 16, 2008
    Its within the limit. But the rules says up to 147lbs. If they are going to limit Cotto to 145lbs, then those are not welterweight rules.
     
  10. Little Pea

    Little Pea 'A' grade boxing fan Full Member

    11,750
    1
    Dec 7, 2007
    147 is the LIMIT. Get it???

    SO as long as there are below 147, the belt can be on the line.
     
  11. Little Pea

    Little Pea 'A' grade boxing fan Full Member

    11,750
    1
    Dec 7, 2007

    145 is a contractual thing. Not related to the belt. Of course, Cotto's team may have asked for the belt not being on the line. Its all about contract. They COULD have fought for the belt even with a 145 (contractual) weight limit.
     
  12. Stinky gloves

    Stinky gloves Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,255
    14
    May 31, 2007
    The weight of 145lb, along with the brand of gloves, the color of shoe laces,
    the advertisements on the trunks and the water brands they spit in
    corner during the break are part of their private agreements.
     
  13. Windigo

    Windigo Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,131
    3
    Jun 22, 2009
    Uh perhaps the middleweight title wasn't on the line becasue it was fought at super middleweight. The middleweight belt shouldnt' change hands in a fight fought at 165.
     
  14. Clarkson

    Clarkson Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,703
    0
    May 7, 2009
    Of course it is in the welterweight limit, and of course the belt can be up for grabs, however I don't blame Cotto for not putting the belt on line when he can't fully take advantage of the weight division.