Calzaghe's hand injury was from way before then - it merely flared up in those fights. You don't address why Hopkins held and hugged - which is because Calzaghe's "SLAPS!!!!!!" and hand speed were too much. Calzaghe perhaps deserved a points deduction, but Hopkins holding was even more inhibitive and should have been punished. And any version of Pavlik would have been schooled by Bhop. The Jones fight was, IMO, pointless, and was signed by Calzaghe for the money alone. I think if he wanted to get Jones out of there he could have As for the comment on a prime Jones fighting Calzaghe, do you really thing Jones would have been interested in fighting Calzaghe? Do you think he would have made an offer? bearing in mind he was an unbeaten European fighter, not much of a draw and he could have made the same money fighting, I dunno, Rick Frazier?
LOL...like he slapped Robin Reid? Calzaghe wouldnt have held Jones Jock Calzaghe was a nobody for a majority of his career...he really only had 3 years at the TOp (POST LACY) Joe had no credibility and didnt deserve a bg fight. that his own fault. Frank Warren even said Joe wasnt like Hatton, didnt put himself in the shop window
My apologies. When you're 43 years old, your stamina isn't quite what it used to be, especially when someone is flapping around in your face all the time. Oh, I forgot Jones fought a cop or something didn't he? The right contract, and if Calzaghe was willing to get on a plane for a fighter with a pulse - the fight could have happened. Less risk for Jones than Calzaghe, that much is certain. Calzaghe had no chance, only risk for Jones really was that the fight wouldn't sell, or would be a boring fight due to Calzaghe's horrible style (kind of like many Calzaghe fights back then).
What are you smoking? Calzaghe would send both Pavlik and Froch on stretchers after landing over 1000 punches. If you have no defense going in against someone like Calzaghe you will leave the ring the same way Lacy did.
Did a Calzaghe fan really just take a shot at Roy's resume? Hey, there were only so many Tocker Pudwills to go around.
Not true - Jones wouldn't have fought him. Not through fear, but through risk/reward. KO a cop - millions of dollars. fight an undefeated champion for same money. It's utterly irrelevant to my point that Calzaghe probably wouldnt have taken the risk. Jones was totally uninterested in fighting live fighters during his peak. You've basically said "He'd have beat him anyway", which whilst it's very conceivable, that's not what creates a resume. Collins, Benn, Eubank and Calzaghe never got near Jones at his prime. Neither did Mike McCallum for that matter, til he was shot. Jones didnt take risk without reward. The fact many many people enjoyed Calzaghe's fights and his style basically means you're just showing yourself up.
I'm a boxing fan - I can criticise every single fighter if I see fit. Both Calzaghe and Jones' resume deserve criticism
Oh yea because there are just stacks of guys around now who would defeat him..................... :rofl
Oh, you mean risk/reward -- where a certain fighter feels it's not worth the risk unless a certain amount of $$ are on the line? Kind of like this? http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/sport...ls/I+am+the+best,+says+honest+Joe+/article.do "I could probably give Jones a tough fight, probably the best fight he's ever had," said Calzaghe. "But I know my capabilities and unless I got paid the crown jewels I wouldn't want to risk it."