Let's say pac beats cotto @ 145 and...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by enzo, Jul 22, 2009.


  1. boxbox

    boxbox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,220
    0
    Feb 4, 2006
    lets get ready to rummmmbleeee!!!!!!:happy
     
  2. thewoo

    thewoo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,769
    4
    Mar 3, 2005
    Again sticking with the original thread question. If I was using this same logic I would say that in the situation presented, Manny agreed on his own will that the fight would not be for a title, he doesn't get a title out of it and he didn't beat the man that people consider the true welterweight champ. I don't see how this is even debatable or how so many people picked yes. Manny would not be the champ in the scenario originally posed by the thread starter.
     
  3. thewoo

    thewoo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,769
    4
    Mar 3, 2005
    Why bother having any fights then? Lets just hand titles out to the guys that we think would win them if they actually fought each other. Even if you believe that the outcome would be the same, if you follow the lineage, Cotto was the champ, lost to Margarito, who lost to Mosley. That makes Mosley the champ.

    There is no criteria for establishing championship under which you could make a case for calling Cotto the champion. He lost the lineage and won a vacant title (the least respected of the 4) that his promoter pretty much bought for him against a bull**** opponent.

    As far as the proof being in Cotto's swollen face, that makes no sense. You get hit repededly and you swell up. Using your logic I would have to assume that Cotto himself is a cheater since his opponents often leave the ring looking disfigured.
     
  4. boxbox

    boxbox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,220
    0
    Feb 4, 2006

    if the belt wasn't on the line, i wouldnt consider him as champ, but considering he did beat one of the champs, he would get the same respect due to him. the belt was just for formality.
     
  5. STGTBOXER

    STGTBOXER Member Full Member

    252
    0
    Aug 22, 2008
  6. butler08

    butler08 Active Member Full Member

    1,091
    0
    Oct 18, 2008
    Well he would still have a win over the best welter in the world in mosely
     
  7. Guidokz

    Guidokz Classic Psycho Full Member

    2,154
    0
    Apr 6, 2009
    since you base your 'opinions' on technicality that much, i ask you..

    why is a 145 lbs catchweight should not be considered a title fight?.
     
  8. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    So anyone really believe that by having this fight at 145 will stop Cotto from coming in on fight night at 158?
     
  9. bronx

    bronx Boxing Junkie banned

    12,190
    0
    Dec 26, 2007
    to me if he beats cotto at 145 he is the champ, and he should defend it like a real champ would against the best Mosely at 147
     
  10. J.E.Cash

    J.E.Cash Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,302
    8
    May 5, 2009
    What do you mean "technically he is"? If the belt is not on the line then technically he is not. Some may consider him the champ in theory, but technically he wouldn't have won a belt.

    As for myself, if the belt is on the line and he wins, then I'll consider him the champ. If the belt is not on the line, then I would consider him great, but not the WW champ. Since they are fighting at a catchweight, I do not personaly think the belt should be on the line, but that's for them to decide.
     
  11. J.E.Cash

    J.E.Cash Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,302
    8
    May 5, 2009
    Regarding your last point, it is different. Cotto coming in at 146 was by choice; however, the limit was 147. He chose to come in a pound lighter. With the catchweight, he is required to come in at 145, when the WW rules allow you to come in up to 147. The rule for the weight class is ignored.
     
  12. boxbox

    boxbox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,220
    0
    Feb 4, 2006

    Cotto coming in at 145 is also Cotto's choice. He wants to fight Pac and is more than willing to do so.

    Is there a rule that fighters agreeing to fight at a certain weight within the boundaries of the division is illegal?
     
  13. Guidokz

    Guidokz Classic Psycho Full Member

    2,154
    0
    Apr 6, 2009
    basically it's his choice to concede for his smaller opponent the moment he signed the contract and he can actually choose not to be required to come down if he doesn't want to..

    but since the contract is presumed reasonable and agreeable, cotto did..
     
  14. Caliboxing

    Caliboxing Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,203
    4,556
    Sep 28, 2007
    Pac would have been a 7 division champion if they had taken this fight at 147. The 2 pound compromise is pointless in my opinion as I don't see how it helps Pac.
     
  15. boxbox

    boxbox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,220
    0
    Feb 4, 2006

    Upperhand in the negotiations?