Biggest mouth but least amount of balls

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by rushman, Jul 23, 2009.


Page 1 of 4
  1. rushman

    rushman Devoid is Devoid Full Member

    7,308
    1
    Jul 24, 2004
    So who has got the worst ratio, biggest mouth but the least amount of balls.

    My vote goes to the most obvious candidate David Haye.

    There are others out there, but I don't think any can compare with this master - this absolute genius - of manufacturing disappointment.
     
    rushman, Jul 23, 2009
    rushman, Jul 23, 2009
    #1
  2. MiracleMan

    MiracleMan Active Member Full Member

    1,102
    5
    Jul 21, 2009
    I was dissapointed in him not fight vitali but hes not good enought to beat either Klitschko.
     
    MiracleMan, Jul 23, 2009
    MiracleMan, Jul 23, 2009
    #2
  3. KOTF

    KOTF Bingooo Full Member

    13,448
    26
    Jun 2, 2009
    Mundine
     
    KOTF, Jul 23, 2009
    KOTF, Jul 23, 2009
    #3
  4. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    Haye has no balls. When it was his time to fight he ran.
     
    Farmboxer, Jul 23, 2009
    Farmboxer, Jul 23, 2009
    #4
  5. Jeff Young

    Jeff Young Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,656
    0
    Jun 5, 2009
    arreola, he eats alot, so he must have a big mouth, and is more hyped then haye....
     
    Jeff Young, Jul 23, 2009
    Jeff Young, Jul 23, 2009
    #5
  6. rushman

    rushman Devoid is Devoid Full Member

    7,308
    1
    Jul 24, 2004
    Mundine is the only boxer I know who is in the same league as David Haye. His mouth may be even bigger than Haye's; but sadly (as I dont have much respect for Mundine) I think he actually has more balls than Haye does. And given what a notorious lack of sack Mundine has that is really saying something.

    So Haye wins by a small margin.
     
    rushman, Jul 23, 2009
    rushman, Jul 23, 2009
    #6
  7. safc1990

    safc1990 Goodbye Bolo :( Full Member

    4,999
    0
    Feb 16, 2008
    Audley Harrison beats Haye hands down here.
     
    safc1990, Jul 23, 2009
    safc1990, Jul 23, 2009
    #7
  8. Rudolph

    Rudolph Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,198
    2
    Apr 23, 2006
    one would think that not even the dumbest haylords could manage to find a legitimate excuse for what this ***** did, especially since he did it twice now.
    but what do you know, ESB is full of threads started by people who are trying to disguise Haye's cowardice as some "smart move" or other such bull****.
    pathetic.
     
    Rudolph, Jul 23, 2009
    Rudolph, Jul 23, 2009
    #8
  9. rushman

    rushman Devoid is Devoid Full Member

    7,308
    1
    Jul 24, 2004
    Not a bad choice. He's up there for consideration.

    But while he has balls the size of tic-tacs like Haye does, he may not be quite as over-accomplished in the mouth department.

    So I still got Haye as the winner.
     
    rushman, Jul 23, 2009
    rushman, Jul 23, 2009
    #9
  10. ricardinho

    ricardinho Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,241
    3
    May 17, 2009
    I vote for Charlie Zellenoff
     
    ricardinho, Jul 23, 2009
    ricardinho, Jul 23, 2009
    #10
  11. KOTF

    KOTF Bingooo Full Member

    13,448
    26
    Jun 2, 2009
    Nah Mundine's worse because w/ all the **** he talks, all he could muster up was a vacated WBA SMW title. To make matters worse, he loses by KO (of all people) to Sven Ottke. He yaps his mouth about how he can beat Sturm and Pavlik and yet we get the great Shannan Taylor and Daniel Geale to show for it. At least Haye has an undisputed CW title to show for his accomplishments.

    Did I mention that Mundine fought Sam Soliman 3 times? Shows that boxing fans like to live under the rule of "what have you done for me lately" rather than "what have you done for your entire career".
     
    KOTF, Jul 23, 2009
    KOTF, Jul 23, 2009
    #11
  12. rushman

    rushman Devoid is Devoid Full Member

    7,308
    1
    Jul 24, 2004
    Sure he lost to Ottke, but at least he got into the ring with the guy. The first step in showing balls is actually getting into the ring (are you listening Mr. Haye?). The second part is what you do once you step through those ropes.
    Getting into the ring against Ottke sounds simple, but for a guy with no amateur fights and only 10 pro fights its a bigger thing to do then it first looks like.

    I will agree that he is a textbook example of the kind of boxer I was thinking of when I made this thread.
     
    rushman, Jul 23, 2009
    rushman, Jul 23, 2009
    #12
  13. kgs83

    kgs83 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,868
    0
    Jan 14, 2008
    Dunno what the major fuss is.....this is a good fight for Haye, sure would rather he fight Klits, but that is not happening. But he is fighting another belt holder which will give him options if he wins.
     
    kgs83, Jul 23, 2009
    kgs83, Jul 23, 2009
    #13
  14. Ivo

    Ivo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,351
    81
    Jul 20, 2004
    One name comes to my mind - David Haye
     
    Ivo, Jul 23, 2009
    Ivo, Jul 23, 2009
    #14
  15. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    19,216
    2
    Dec 10, 2005
    The guy who went to fight the linear cruiserweight champion and Don King Fighter Mormeck on a Don King card in his hometown has 'no balls'.

    Who would've thought it?
     
    Cobbler, Jul 23, 2009
    Cobbler, Jul 23, 2009
    #15
Page 1 of 4