Miguel Cotto Has NO BUSINESS Losing to Manny Pacman

lol. so stop visiting pacland you mexican. even i don't stay too much on the site. i just come in there for the news more than the board.

 

i just can't help pointing some ironic and BS post from some. i once called uliuli a mexican and he suddenly accused me of being a racist. wtf!!!

 

A slugger from Mindanao trained by Donaire snr.
:yep

 

putang inang milmas,

have fun owning yourself there. ulol! :good

 

Yeah that's what these guys do. Criticize guys from their country and you're instantly racist yet there's nothing wrong at all with them criticizing every single fighter out of Mexico, that's not racist at all.

According to these guys boxing ability, taxi driving, dish washing and nursing are all races.

 

Sorry Scar but I must disagree. Cotta isnt THAT much better then Hatton in skills? Can't be serious. And DLH may have been better but he was a shell of his former self when he fought Pac. I mean comon look at his fight with Steve Forbes. He looked terrible.

 

Yeah but Cotto is being sued by his uncle for 7mil LOL!

 

Wasn't it the other way around?

You guys badmouthing Pac for beating them. Like hell we need to badmouth them for? We would rather celebrate than insult.

Common Sense?

 

Good post TFFP!

I wonder what would be the betting in vegas at that time?

100usd bet on PAC will win 180usd or 100usd bet on PAC will earn 75usd?!

 

Based on attributes alone Cotto has a HUGE chance at loosing. Throw in that PAC is a more dynamic boxer than cotto and PAC's chances increase. Cotto is technically a solid boxer.

Very orthodox, high tight guard, chin tucked and slightly bouncing on his toes.....but he's slower, more predictable in his offense and defense where PAC is fast, lighter on his feet, busier and unpredictable.

Cotto is a classic kind of boxer who has a few flaws that PAC's style and NATRUAL GIFTS will be to his advantage. Cotto has his power and natrual size advantage over Manny.

Which is why this fight can go either way. Cotto doesn't really have a lot of athletic ability or natural gifts that guys like Floyd and PAC enjoy. He's got a strong mental fortitude, warrior spirit and a good solid foundation.

Cotto has a chance to KO Pac, but he'll have to do it early, otherwise his lack of attributes that PAC has will become more and more prevalent as the rounds go one. Speed and PAC's Jab will cause Cotto problems ever finding a rythm is what I think will be the factor in Manny winning inside the distance.

 

C'mon bro....DLH is known for his "D" and Ricky had Floyd Sr to help him improve his "D". I mean not that Ricks "D" would have really made a big difference, improved or not. PAC was just faster and had more demensions. Rick tried to use head movement early on and early on his head movement wasn't fast enough.

 

I think this will be a close fight, it all depends on how Cotto takes Pac's best shots and vice versa. But i'm giving the edge to Cotto.

 

All i want to add to this thread is the Pacman ive seen lately is gone before his opponent even gets to hit him.

Its like Pop Pop Pop gone.

Other fighter were did Pacman go.

I stand by this, If Cotto is to win he needs to have his best night and im talking better than the one against Mosely.

 

Are you saying PAC doesn't have "D"?:huh I assure you if you can make a sharp shooter like JMM miss and miss often you most certainly have "D". PAC enjoys the benefits of tremendous reflexes as well, but he's got the defensive prowess of a seasoned ring vet.

Not everyone is Floyd Jr.....but PAC has better "D" than cotto based on his natrual abilities that favors Manny. I'll admit that Cotto is a classic boxer with a very classic boxing style that looks like he is more polished from a technical standpoint, but it doesn't mean Manny isn't as skilled....just more unorthodox.

 

I agree with this. It's very logical, but I "used" to use logic when predicting PAC fights. But I lost when I bet against a more proven and more technically solid and multi demensional JMM to beat PAC, I did the same when MAB was scheduled to face PAC as well as DLH. EM was the only one that I got right for the first time with PAC.

Logically PAC should have beaten anyone of those guys....Ricky included based on the disadvantages agaist him...whether it be physical, technical or both. But now PAC is very much improved with the same natrual gifts that allowed him to defy the odds earlier on in his fights with the 3 mexican greats.

PAC is and always will be beatable and susceptiable to the KO going against natrually larger men. But he is a better boxer than I think you are willing to credit him with. I favor PAC based on pure natrual advantages that have nothing to due with physical demensions and everything else. I think Cotto's natrual advantages won't be over to over come the smaller man's natrual advantages. But we'll see.