Stop acting like cotto is that much better than hatton

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by VanillaKilla, Jul 24, 2009.


  1. doubleplaidinum

    doubleplaidinum Maravilla Full Member

    8,397
    0
    Mar 31, 2008
    this. nice first response!
     
  2. doubleplaidinum

    doubleplaidinum Maravilla Full Member

    8,397
    0
    Mar 31, 2008
    he didn't look good against mosley? :tired
     
  3. cdnboxing

    cdnboxing Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,638
    0
    Jun 20, 2008
    Cotto is much better than Hatton but not the right style to beat Pacquiao.

    Pacquiao beats Cotto.

    But dont get it twisted, Cotto is a far superior fighter than Hatton. No way Hatton comes out with only 1 loss fighting the fighters Cotto has fought. Hatton loses to Clottey, Mosley, Margarito.
     
  4. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    22,780
    350
    Aug 26, 2006
    Cotto didn't look good when he tko Quintana in the 5th round In Cotto first fight at welterweight?
     
  5. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    22,780
    350
    Aug 26, 2006
    Do you actually believe everything you just post? If Hatton and Cotto are the same A level fighters then Hatton would have no problem at ww and Hatton should beat Mosley, Quintana, Clottey but since you say Hatton don't belong in the ww, Hatton is not in Cotto level.
     
  6. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee VIP Member

    51,588
    17,136
    Mar 5, 2006
    that's like saying pac looked good against David Diaz.

    Actually, he didn't look that bad against Clottey. I think he's a live underdog november 14th.
     
  7. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee VIP Member

    51,588
    17,136
    Mar 5, 2006
    No one looks good against Mosley. tough fight for Cotto. He fought great on the back foot in the 11th round.
     
  8. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    22,780
    350
    Aug 26, 2006
    What? Quintana is 10 times better then David freaking Diaz. Quintana has beaten Julio and Williams. Julio and Williams i bet ya is way better fighters then all of fighters that David Diaz beat.
     
  9. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee VIP Member

    51,588
    17,136
    Mar 5, 2006
    Diaz lasted longer than Quintana. Its all subjective.
     
  10. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    22,780
    350
    Aug 26, 2006
    So? Before facing Pacquiao, Diaz barely won vs a shot in the dark ruined Morales. Diaz is a bum fighter pure and simple. To try and compare Pac tko Diaz to Cotto tko Quintana is freaking stupid. Diaz is a bum easy to hit fighter while Quintana who has far better skills with quickness and is a slick fighter.
     
  11. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee VIP Member

    51,588
    17,136
    Mar 5, 2006
    if diaz is a bum fighter and he lasted 9 rounds, what does that make Hatton?:think
     
  12. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt FROM THE RIVER TO THE SEA Full Member

    404,288
    86,373
    Nov 30, 2006
    Bumhole? :conf
     
  13. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee VIP Member

    51,588
    17,136
    Mar 5, 2006
    :lol::good
     
  14. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    22,780
    350
    Aug 26, 2006
    An exposed Fighter. I never consider Hatton to be real good anyway. I think he was way overrated cause of his wrestling win over past his prime Kostya.
     
  15. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee VIP Member

    51,588
    17,136
    Mar 5, 2006
    well, he only lost to two of the top p4p fighters this last decade. I don't that's a fair assessment of a guy who has 40 wins.

    Would you consider Cotto to be 'exposed' if he lost by KO to pacquiao?

    Both Cotto and Hatton would have the same amount of losses in their careers.:think