Stop acting like cotto is that much better than hatton

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by VanillaKilla, Jul 24, 2009.


  1. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Cotto has always been a better fighter than Hatton.
     
  2. In_FlaMeS

    In_FlaMeS K-BKois Full Member

    954
    0
    Jul 19, 2004
    Hatton is a good brawler ... Cotto have skills and ring intelligence
     
  3. BENNY BLANCO

    BENNY BLANCO R.I.P. Brooklyn1550 Full Member

    10,718
    9
    Mar 8, 2008
    Cotto is that much better than Hatton.
     
  4. paloalto00

    paloalto00 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    5
    Mar 15, 2009
    Shhh you guys are telling too much of the truth
     
  5. roly

    roly Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,775
    8
    Aug 11, 2005
    what's that got to do with it? do you agree with him that the clottley and quintana wins are better than anything hatton has ever done?
     
  6. paloalto00

    paloalto00 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    5
    Mar 15, 2009
    Because of course if you're from Europe you are going to be on Hatton's nutsack. And yes I do agree, Quintana was the **** for PR til Cotto demolished him; and Clottey was a feared fighter in WW, in which Cotto went to war with dispite having a period on his eye
     
  7. pngo

    pngo #1Contender Full Member

    7,543
    1
    Apr 24, 2007
    I do agree with that.

    His win over KT was always overrated. He was in his own backyard with a biased ref on his side that let him do whatever
    dirty tactics he wanted. No to mention KT was like 36 or 37 years old.
     
  8. Tito Time

    Tito Time slayin um Full Member

    3,919
    1
    May 24, 2006
    :lol:
     
  9. pauliemayweathe

    pauliemayweathe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,995
    0
    Dec 27, 2007
    that is in resume...which u are leaving out a ton of fights cotto had that were tough coming up such as chop chop...torres...abdullaev etc....bottom line in a ring head to head cotto wins EVERY time
     
  10. roly

    roly Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,775
    8
    Aug 11, 2005

    so a win over koysta one of the best 140 fighters EVER and lineal champ for 4 or 5 years isn't as good as wins over quintana who hadn't even fought for a belt before the cotto fight and clottley who had only just fought for one in the previous fight. and neither were even in the top 3 in there division at the time of there fights. another moron.
     
  11. roly

    roly Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,775
    8
    Aug 11, 2005
    35, about the same age as cotto's best win was against mosely.
     
  12. paloalto00

    paloalto00 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    5
    Mar 15, 2009
    I'm a moron? So I guess you think Calzaghe is the best because he beat 40+ versions of hopkins and jones... but that's ok because they WERE the best. Stfu.

    MAYBE you could have used that as a good arguement back in 1997 when Vince Phillips beat him..... but no.
     
  13. BrooklynMumin

    BrooklynMumin HOPKINS A " G " Full Member

    6,797
    4
    Aug 17, 2008
    Cotto is better than ur mother!!!
     
  14. roly

    roly Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,775
    8
    Aug 11, 2005
    calzaghe was the best smw when he retied, but jones would have beat him in his prime and hopkins quite possibly although hopkins still had enough left after calzaghe to embaress pavlik. but koysta was coming off a 3 demolition of mitchell 6 moths before the hatton fight.
     
  15. Ricky369

    Ricky369 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,468
    144
    Feb 16, 2008
    Forget Cotto. Lets talk about Hatton. He has never been worth ****!!!!
    Victory over an about to retired Kostya
    Victory over a way passed his prime Castillo
    Victory over a nobody Urango.
    Lost to gatekeeper Collazo. (but was given a gift)
    When has Paulie win an important fight????