Jimmy bivins and Lloyd Marshall just as great if not greater than Charly Burley?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by cotto20, Jul 26, 2009.


  1. cotto20

    cotto20 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,836
    22
    May 31, 2009
    In his prime bivins beat burley, lloyd marshal, ezzard charles, archie moore, joey maxim, teddy yarosz and oakland billy smith, but stll could not get a title shot! the one time him and burley met in a middleweight bout jimmy beat him on points.


    In his prime Lloyd Marshall beat teddy yarosz, tommy farr, freddie mils, joey maxim, holman williams, jake la motta, ezzard charles and the one time him and burley met, marshall beat burley.

    So do you have a good case that these 2 fighters were greater? both dont get half the respect or credit burley does
     
  2. Minotauro

    Minotauro Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,628
    712
    May 22, 2007
    Yes especially Marshall. I rate Burley high but never understood how people can place Burley in the top 20/25 p4p yet have Holman and Marshall so low often outside of top 50. Holman and Mashall possibly have better resume as well.
     
  3. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    92
    Aug 21, 2008
  4. cotto20

    cotto20 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,836
    22
    May 31, 2009
    I rate burley better than holman williams only just
     
  5. TheGreatA

    TheGreatA Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,241
    153
    Mar 4, 2009
    It's a bit of a shame that Bivins and Marshall do not get the respect they deserve.

    Marshall was inconsistent and Bivins at the end of his career lost as much as he won, but at their best both could produce great results and beat many great fighters.

    Bivins' went unbeaten from 1942 to 1946. The number of great fighters he beat during that period is astonishing. Unfortunately his best years were during the Second World War when the world titles were "frozen" and thus he never received an official title shot. Bivins at nearly 90 years of age is amazingly still among us, considering what he has gone through in his life.
     
  6. cotto20

    cotto20 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,836
    22
    May 31, 2009
    great post very intresting read, out of the 3 of them bivins, lloyd and burley who do you rate as the best?
     
  7. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    Bivins is probably my number one of the era of the 'uncrowned champs', excluding Moore of course, and Charles. Marshall's win resume is probably the best, but i like Bivins then Burley personally.
     
  8. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,912
    47,911
    Mar 21, 2007
    Absolutley you can rate them higher.

    Where Burley does outstandingly well is contemporary opinion. There were people who fought or worked with him during this time that rated him the best of the era. No fighter was so fiercely ducked.
     
  9. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    I do think at their respective pound for pound primes though that Burley may have been the best.
     
  10. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    268
    Jul 22, 2004
    Burley was a WW who went upto MW and LHW because he was froze out. His resume is far deeper than Williams, just look at some of the guys he faced his resume is bloody deep. Marshall was a MW turned LHW, hence 2 modern weight classes bigger than Burley.

    Bivins was a LHW turned HW, 4 modern weight classes bigger than Burley.
     
  11. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    Bivin's very est weight was not too far from middle from what i bleieve.
     
  12. TheGreatA

    TheGreatA Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,241
    153
    Mar 4, 2009
    Bivins and Marshall didn't outweigh Burley by that much when they fought each other though. He wasn't facing any disadvantages in height or reach either.

    Holman Williams was outweighed the same amount by Burley but it didn't stop him from winning a 15 round decision.
     
  13. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    92
    Aug 21, 2008
    Bivins was only a middleweight at the time they fought. On top of that, he had just turned pro earlier in the year and had only had about 10 fights, while Burley was already an established leading contender. That Bivins was able to go to Burley's hometown and dominate him like that is huge.
     
  14. good right hand

    good right hand Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,876
    10
    Jul 26, 2004
    what humbles me is how classy bivins is and i remember him saying in a interview that he just tried his best and sometimes it was enough, but he dident consider himself a better fighter then those he beat. what a gentlemen.

    he should have at least this accomplishment and that was that he was i believe the first ever intrim champion in two divisions at once, heavyweight and lightheavyweight.
     
  15. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,912
    47,911
    Mar 21, 2007
    I honestly consider it one of the single best wins of all time.

    Bivins did have a "natural" size advantage though.