Cotto vs Pac UPDATE!!!!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by lern1079, Jul 28, 2009.


Page 1 of 3
  1. lern1079

    lern1079 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,978
    0
    Feb 3, 2005
    1. It's a possibility that the title will be put on the line for the Pac vs Cotto fight. It seems that Pac has insisted on the title and maybe something with the sanctioning fees can be worked out.

    2. Top Rank is trying to make Valero vs Soto on the undercard which I think would he a sick as one of the fights in the undercard.

    November 14th is looking better and better.
     
    lern1079, Jul 28, 2009
    lern1079, Jul 28, 2009
    #1
  2. theuppercut

    theuppercut Blackpudding supper Full Member

    6,084
    0
    Apr 21, 2009
    Cotto v Pac
    Valero v Soto
    Khan v Maidana

    That would be a sensational card.
     
    theuppercut, Jul 28, 2009
    theuppercut, Jul 28, 2009
    #2
  3. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    1. can you give a source for this? I read an interview recently where Pac said it didn't matter if the title was on the line

    2. that would be great but call me sceptical i don't see it happening
     
    PH|LLA, Jul 28, 2009
    PH|LLA, Jul 28, 2009
    #3
  4. mckay_89

    mckay_89 Haw you! Full Member

    4,600
    23
    Dec 7, 2008
    With Valero v Soto on the card this would be the best bill of the year.
     
    mckay_89, Jul 28, 2009
    mckay_89, Jul 28, 2009
    #4
  5. Monstar

    Monstar The Future.. Full Member

    11,166
    0
    Oct 10, 2007
    unless Pac's paying his fee's i doubt the title will be on the line...

    and uhh, that would be a great undercard fight, can't wait for this 1
     
    Monstar, Jul 28, 2009
    Monstar, Jul 28, 2009
    #5
  6. lern1079

    lern1079 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,978
    0
    Feb 3, 2005
    Both fighters have to pay the fees.
     
    lern1079, Jul 28, 2009
    lern1079, Jul 28, 2009
    #6
  7. SouthpawSlayer

    SouthpawSlayer Im coming for you Full Member

    16,351
    2
    Sep 6, 2008
    hopefully its a good undercard
     
    SouthpawSlayer, Jul 28, 2009
    SouthpawSlayer, Jul 28, 2009
    #7
  8. amunz81

    amunz81 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,184
    70
    May 2, 2006
    belt = fight at 147!
     
    amunz81, Jul 28, 2009
    amunz81, Jul 28, 2009
    #8
  9. Tito Time

    Tito Time slayin um Full Member

    3,919
    1
    May 24, 2006
    :deal
     
    Tito Time, Jul 28, 2009
    Tito Time, Jul 28, 2009
    #9
  10. Cubanborn87

    Cubanborn87 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,124
    0
    Apr 24, 2009

    that would be amazing , i think too good to be true
     
    Cubanborn87, Jul 28, 2009
    Cubanborn87, Jul 28, 2009
    #10
  11. amunz81

    amunz81 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,184
    70
    May 2, 2006
    waaayy to good to be true.
     
    amunz81, Jul 28, 2009
    amunz81, Jul 28, 2009
    #11
  12. snell

    snell FEU-NRMF Full Member

    1,286
    0
    Jun 2, 2009

    scared :lol::lol::lol:

    catch weight with belt on the line is common!! :good
     
    snell, Jul 28, 2009
    snell, Jul 28, 2009
    #12
  13. Silvermags

    Silvermags Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    0
    Oct 28, 2007
    I don't care if cotto has the belt as long as PAC demolishes him :lol:
     
    Silvermags, Jul 28, 2009
    Silvermags, Jul 28, 2009
    #13
  14. jc

    jc Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,971
    14
    Sep 9, 2004
    Its less confusing if the belt is on the line. I do think the fight should be at 147 though.
     
    jc, Jul 28, 2009
    jc, Jul 28, 2009
    #14
  15. amunz81

    amunz81 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,184
    70
    May 2, 2006
    lol @ pac demolishing cotto!!! not gonna happen so get ready for dissapointment!
     
    amunz81, Jul 28, 2009
    amunz81, Jul 28, 2009
    #15
Page 1 of 3