Marquez vs Morales

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by radab, Jul 29, 2009.


  1. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    Bill, you're a good poster, and we'll have to agree to disagree.
     
  2. scatterbrain

    scatterbrain Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,867
    0
    Dec 7, 2008
    morales. and i can see him scoring a KD or 2.

    via UD.
     
  3. radab

    radab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,721
    1
    Dec 14, 2008



    sure Morales was great - better than both pac and marco

    but, i just think marquez was too refined

    marquez by half a pube

    :deal
     
  4. Realspitts

    Realspitts Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,284
    0
    Nov 16, 2008
    @ 126 morales beats marquez 10/10
     
  5. radab

    radab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,721
    1
    Dec 14, 2008



    thats a load of horsepiss


    this is about as close as they come


    marquez has the slightest of edges over manny's other master
     
  6. Realspitts

    Realspitts Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,284
    0
    Nov 16, 2008
    after making a "im marquez' biggest nutthugger thread" all about yourself and saying homo **** like "marquez looks like he should be in playboy with the additional muscle etc" .. do you really think your opinion counts? SERIOUSLY.
     
  7. Money7

    Money7 The Best Full Member

    1,440
    2
    Oct 6, 2004
    morales in his prime was a beast...he could box, brawl, and mix it up... i think it would be a good, tactical fight with morales pulling out the UD.. 7-5
     
  8. radab

    radab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,721
    1
    Dec 14, 2008




    agree with a lot of this

    best bring up the bits i have doubts with.....


    1) Barrera arguably beat prime Morales (1st fight)

    2) Agree Morales was past his best when he beat pac, but pac was nowhere near the ******* Marquez had to deal with - you saw what that version of pac did to Barrera and (albeit a very shot) Morales
     
  9. madkillaz692000

    madkillaz692000 Fuerte y Abundante Full Member

    3,492
    0
    May 3, 2009
  10. scatterbrain

    scatterbrain Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,867
    0
    Dec 7, 2008
    a crude pac kd him 3x in the first fight.
    a way over the hill mab kd him in their fight.

    you are overestimating marquez here. a prime beast morales will send jmm to the canvas 1 or twice and that will be the basis for the UD
     
  11. gottagivafight

    gottagivafight When you least expect it, expect it!!! banned Full Member

    6,566
    1,792
    Jun 14, 2008
    Would've been great to see.
     
  12. radab

    radab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,721
    1
    Dec 14, 2008



    it's possible dude

    but morales never had the devastating speed and power that manny did

    cant see marquez ever ending up in that position with anyone but manny


    in all 6 fights morales never sent pac or barrera to the canvas

    no reason to believe it would be any different against a superior technical boxer
     
  13. Totomabs

    Totomabs Sauna Belt Holder Full Member

    4,226
    0
    Dec 9, 2007
    i pick morales by close ud
     
  14. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    71,066
    27,737
    Jul 26, 2004
    I think Morales wins a trilogy.... i think he presses it to Marquez in the skilled, focused ferocity that a prime morales brought, with his combo of balance, timing, power, combination punching, chin, and the fact he will bring it all fight.... im confident in a Morales win, with maybe JMM tasting the canvas... dont forget a past it MAB put JMM down pretty good in their fight, yes.. i realise were talking a differant fight here but JMM is prone to being hurt by elite fighters with pop... and i think Morales barely edges him.
     
  15. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee Loyal Member

    46,709
    14,163
    Mar 5, 2006
    if pac didn't crash the party in 2003, we might have seen this fight happen.

    let's say pac gets smashed by barrera. JMM vs Morales or JMM vs Barrera at their peak

    Luckily we have 1 fighter, to own them all.