How come Arreola wasn't complaining about the contract with Vitali?

here's where it all went wrong for davey. he thought he was intimidating both Klitschkos and he thought they would avoid fighting him. Then he could really talk up a storm. But a funny thing happened Wlad obliged and wanted to fight Haye. davey did not expect this. then when Wlad kept sending the contracts to davey to sign, davey began to get scared. and irrational. his feet got cold. he only signed because he had to. then he faked the injury, and yall know the rest.

but haye thought he could intimidate Wlad, so he could act like he did on the escalator. act like the big man. But he realized he failed. and then when Wlad came after him, it's davey boy who got frightened and intimidated. davey boy ran away. then when Vitali came looking to slaughter his ass, he ran away again.

 

Because he's not a coward?

 

Haye confident to beat Wlad

Haye pulls out of the fight with Wlad. Wow, this shows great confidence. :bart:bart

 

Arreola is not complaining about Klitschko contract. Vitali will be fighting Arreola in his own back yard!!!!!!!

Chambers is not complaining and nobody else is complaining except the fraud Haye. It is Vitali who has the WBC championship. It is Vlad who has the IBO, IBF, WBO, Ring Championships. Haye has nothing but diarrhea of the mouth.

 

haye is a *****. chris is not.

 

because he wasnt offered a slave contract!

 

:good

Sauerland always has options 3 fight minimum! Haye did not complane about this!

So i doubt that Haye ever want to fight one of the Klitschko Brothers.

 

No one but Haye has ever complained about dealing with KlitschKOs. No one! Haye is just full of sh!t. And of course he is not willing to face the best.

 

No, it's entire understandable. The pain in the ass is the ***** talk of him and especially his rabies ridden fans how it's only the Klitschkos fault, how they are ducking him, blablablabla. The issue itself is clear and from a business point obviously the clever choice.

 

What a **** post

What makes me laugh is how you muppets dissing Haye cant stop talking about him it seems.

 

Chinese whispers and amateur psychology.

 

All this "smart business move" talk on Haye's behalf is bull****. I mean in a way it was but that's only because Haye knew he had absolutely no chance of beating Vitali. If he stays away from the Klitschkos he can enjoy a nice heavyweight campaign. I honestly wonder whether or not he actually believed that he could beat Wladimir. It's ironic that one could be safer fighting a 7'2" 320 lb. man but that's what it is. As for the contract negotiations with Arreola, why should they be difficult? Vitali's a draw in LA and that's basically Arreola's backyard. You got 2 guys who are looking for a fight and are willing to dot the i's and cross the t's. It's been said time and time again on this thread that Haye is the only guy who had a problem with the contracts. Why is everyone willing to play ball except Haye? I guess getting to fight the best heavyweights in the world for millions of dollars just isn't enough. In addition, Valuev giving his opinion on the contracts is inconsequential. Considering that the Haye fight fell into his lap and that he himself clearly has no interest in fighting either Klitschko, why not align himself with Haye in that manner and take a shot at the contracts?

I liked Haye more as a cruiserweight when he was more of a fighter than a talker. Sure, he talked but at least he followed through. Now he's just wasting people's time. Going after Valuev is the equivalent of finding a loophole as Nikolai is slow and beatable. Not to mention the fact that he is older. Evander Holyfield outfought him for crying out loud and Evander is 46!

 

I haven't read any of the relevant contracts so I have no means to correctly judge whether Haye (supported by Valuev) is fair in his criticism of them.

I cannot infer anything from the agreement between Arreola & Vitali because that's a different fight in a different place with different stakeholders. It makes no sense to draw any conclusions from this.

Until such time as I do read Haye's contracts and understand enough legal jargon to make full sense of them, I have no opinion on the matter.

Whether you like Haye or loathe him, if you have an opinion on these contracts but have not read them then your opinion has no merit.

 

Nobody knows if its the same contract so how can you compare it?