Then that beggars the question, what's your definition of a pure athlete? I'm genuinely interested to hear your answer.
shane and pac is physically strong but floyd got the complete package of an athlete. strong, light quick, accurace, good balance and got sharp reflexes. He just does everything right.... a rare boxer.
:huh pac is also lightnting quick and carried hes tremendous power up so many weight divisions. forget shane because hes almost certainly used steroids
He wont answer...Or maybe... Pure athlete: Someone who never took drug. Some intellectuals here you know.
Dan B. a good athelte tend to be good in multiple areas. nobody on that list is as versaltile as floyd. Floyd wins this easy. Shane is like a linebacker while floyd is like a reciever slash quarterback.
Just as I thought, you're incapable of engaging on an intellectual level. Don't worry, there are many like you on this forum.
I appreciate your contribution but it isn't logical. Usain Bolt could be considered a "pure athlete" but in what way is he versatile?
I don't necessarily disagree with you but please, someone, define a "pure athlete". It's a pretty wide question.
you still seem deluded by this whole topic. Shane mosley is a disgrace if he used steroids and entered a ring(its proen he did, but he uses the excuse he didnt know what it was). With all the deaths surrounding boxing, pieces of cheating frauds who cheat like that and enter the ring are a disgrace. as i said there are still deluded people out there like you, who simply choose to skim over the facts.