Mikkel Kessler is a bigger Juan Manuel Marquez

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by bluebird, Aug 1, 2009.


  1. bluebird

    bluebird Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,930
    2,692
    Apr 17, 2009
    Technically flawless, throw their punches the same way/same angles, beautiful counter punchers both refuse to hold in fights unless their opponets initiate it. Both lack head movement but still have great defence, so many comparisons between the two.
     
  2. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,291
    23
    Sep 21, 2006
    Jmm has the edge over Kessler with his inside game though.
     
  3. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    :roll:
     
  4. VanillaKilla

    VanillaKilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,611
    1
    Oct 31, 2008
    I can see the comparison, but I think that Marquez is more of a warrior. Kessler is a cold machine. I cant really see kessler getting into wars like marquez. Marquez has the heart of a lion, kessler is like a computer :thumbsup
     
  5. J.R.

    J.R. No Mames Guey Full Member

    15,033
    5
    May 26, 2008
    Meh... both guys have a technical based style, but JMM is much more varied with what he can do in the ring.
     
  6. TFFP

    TFFP The Eskimo

    45,002
    3
    Nov 28, 2007
    Hmm, they both throw straight punches for the most part but not really similar.

    Marquez is more of a textbook counterpuncher whereas Kessler is not a counterpuncher ordinarily. Kessler prefers to dictate things with a consistent jab, and if anything he likes to dominate so he can come forward.
     
  7. Jetset78

    Jetset78 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,670
    0
    Jul 30, 2007
    Kessler is only bigger a) physically and b) in Denmark

    Otherwise JMM is bigger in ring.

    Need to see what Kessler does in super 6 first
     
  8. D-MAC

    D-MAC Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,294
    6
    Apr 15, 2008
    Marquez has a bit more in his arsenal for me.
     
  9. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Understatement of the year.
     
  10. 4Rounder

    4Rounder Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,275
    21
    May 14, 2006
    Marquez wouldn't have lost to a slapping machine with no power.
     
  11. CASH_718

    CASH_718 "You ****ed Healy?" Full Member

    18,614
    8
    Apr 10, 2005
    Kill yourself.
     
  12. TFFP

    TFFP The Eskimo

    45,002
    3
    Nov 28, 2007
    They look kinda similar if you take a really simplistic view but look carefully...

    The key thing is Kessler is not a natural counterpuncher. If Kessler was a counterpuncher he would have knocked Calzaghe down and out. He landed a few counters but nothing compared to the opportunities he missed.

    Marquez's basic plan has always been to counter, he can do more if needed but I feel that is where he's most comfortable.

    Kessler likes to control things all the way, he wants to lead not counter.
     
  13. bluebird

    bluebird Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,930
    2,692
    Apr 17, 2009
    Kessler uses his jab more and Marquez is better in the inside, other than that they are pretty similar, only the stance then seperates them as Marquez has a crab like stance while Kessler has a textbook cover up.
     
  14. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    100% agreed.
     
  15. CASH_718

    CASH_718 "You ****ed Healy?" Full Member

    18,614
    8
    Apr 10, 2005
    Exactly. Kessler isnt a great counter puncher and when someone goes on the attack he usually goes into a shell until they stop firing. Plus Kessler is pretty predictable in what he does and the punches he throws.