What should happen to the controversial ending of Bradley-Campbell?

rules state it should go to the scorecards or ruled a desceion in the first four rounds.

 

Bradley didn't do enough to deserve a ****ing stoppage other than use that big ass 5 head to cause that cut.

 

If a cut is cause by an acidental headbutt before the 4th round the fight is ruled a no decision ... if a cut is cause by a punch its ruled a TKO ... and if the cut cause by an acidental butt is cause after the 4th you go to the scorecards ...

It was apparent that the cut was caused by a headbutt before the 4th, Campbell couldn't see then the fight has to be stopped and ruled a no decision.

It wasn't anything that went down that showed me that Nate wanted to quit, other than that big ass gash on his eye brow stretching down to his eye lid cause by that big ass neanderthal/dolphin forehead of Bradley's.

 

edit

 

It should be NO CONTEST.

The rules are very clear.

 

The fight was not stopped by the referee. Nate Campbell, if anything, only had reason to believe that the referee did not rule the cut caused by a headbutt when it occured, obviously, based on what happened - so why did the fight end? Because Nate Campbell retired. Again, the referee DID NOT STOP THE FIGHT. Campbell stopped the fight. There's alot of confusion.

 

This content is protected

Tim Bradley used that 5 head to his advantage

 

you're bitching more than Nate Campbell tonight.

 

Nate only did that because he thought it was gonna be a ND. That much is clear.

Kind of a ***** move, as a fan, but Nate's right, should be a ND.

 

So that clear things up.

If the ref didn't stopped the fight . . . but Nate refused to CONTINUE then it should definitely be a TKO. :deal

 

It was an accidental headbut you idiot!! It's boxing and they happen all the time.. what doesn't happen all the time is pussees like Campbell screaming over a little cut and begging to have the fight stopped. Bradley came in top shape, was kicking Nate's ass... Nate clearly wanted a way out and NO he doesn't deserve to have the result changed. **** pusees like him.!

 

The doctor stopped the fight after Campbell said he couldn't see.

Whether that was true or not is another thing. However nobody here can possibly say for certain at the moment if it was or not.

What if Campbell comes back from the hospital with a confirmed injury of the eye? If that was the case he should be applauded for being truthful to the ringside doctor, rather than stupidly risking his own eye sight.

I have my doubts though that the injury was as bad as what was made out. However rules are rules. No desputing the cut was caused by a clash of heads.

 

***** move that backfired... I'm OK with the TKO decision.

 

well ***** if he couldn't see then its obvious that he can't continue ...

if the butt never happened and the cut never happened then the fight would've continued and then we could've seen what really would've happened.

Probably never been in a fight in your ****in life chump.

 

This was the exact same thing that happened in the Toney-Rahman fight, even the same round.

I thought Rahman pussed out in that fight, and to a certain extent thought Campbell did tonight; however, rules are rules, and Toney-Rahman was ruled a no contest, as this one obviously should be.