Nate Campell´s trainer is a total idiot

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Toney, Aug 2, 2009.


Page 1 of 3
  1. Toney

    Toney Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,744
    2
    Nov 29, 2004
    4 very obvious things about Timothy Bradleys fight against Nate Campell:

    1. Bradley dominated
    This was a easy night for Bradley and he would had been even more dominant towards the end. Campell had no chance.

    2. Campell quit trying to get a NC
    Nate Campell could see with that eye. The cut was not that bad at all, but Nate is smart, he know that he could not win the fight and he wanted to get another big payday. So, he said he could not see to get a NC.

    3. Campell´s trainer is a ****ING IDIOT
    After the third round Campell came to his corner, he know he could not win, so he wanted to quit to get a NC. Right away he claimed he could not see. But his trainer Jim Waldrop said "your ok" and tryed to start working on the cut. He wiped the blood off. The Campell had you yell at him to make him understand he wanted not to fight :lol: That was funny ****. Campell´s eyes told his trainer like "Don´t you ****ing get what I am trying to do? Are you that ****ing stupid?".
     
    Toney, Aug 2, 2009
    Toney, Aug 2, 2009
    #1
  2. NickBarker

    NickBarker Damnum Absque Injuria Full Member

    2,554
    1
    Jun 20, 2007
    Aside from there only being three points in your post, as opposed to the four you claim in the topic sentence, I agree with what you said.
     
    NickBarker, Aug 2, 2009
    NickBarker, Aug 2, 2009
    #2
  3. Back Hand Slap

    Back Hand Slap Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,270
    1
    Jul 18, 2009
    Fail.
     
    Back Hand Slap, Aug 2, 2009
    Back Hand Slap, Aug 2, 2009
    #3
  4. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    Bradley didn't dominate. I believe Nate realised he had a tough fight under his hands and taht it would be real hard to win esp. with a cut above his eye.
     
    PH|LLA, Aug 2, 2009
    PH|LLA, Aug 2, 2009
    #4
  5. jimmy_riggs

    jimmy_riggs New Member Full Member

    54
    5
    Aug 2, 2009
    I didnt see the domination everyone is talking about either. Bradley was winning but nate wasnt hurt from punches. Bradley threw a lot of punches but they weren't clean.
     
    jimmy_riggs, Aug 2, 2009
    jimmy_riggs, Aug 2, 2009
    #5
  6. JuanMa

    JuanMa business as usual Full Member

    3,448
    0
    Jun 26, 2009
    HAHA classic..
    I cant see.. Jim i cant see...Your alright.. JIM I CANT SEE..your ok...JIMMM I CANT SEEE... it's nothing Shoves jim.. JIM I CANT SEE..JIM oh i get it..lol
     
    JuanMa, Aug 2, 2009
    JuanMa, Aug 2, 2009
    #6
  7. 555east

    555east Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,948
    0
    Oct 24, 2007
    after 3 rounds i think it's way too premature for everyone saying it would have been an easy fight for Bradley.

    I know this has been said before, but look at how Cotto-Margarito and Froch-Taylor started out, and look how both of those respective fights turned out

    yes Bradley was doing well, and looked to have the edge after a very strong 3rd round

    but IMO very inaccurate to say he was "dominating" and furthermore I found the commentator who was saying Nate "looked old in their and flat" to be
    This content is protected


    was Bradley pressing and in control of the action.. sure

    but the announcer, and the thread starter make it seem as if Campbell was on the bring of being stopped .. which isn't the case.
     
    555east, Aug 2, 2009
    555east, Aug 2, 2009
    #7
  8. Zerwas1

    Zerwas1 Active Member Full Member

    933
    1
    Aug 31, 2006
    All the guys who only saw some streams(bad quality) are talking about a domination....bradley didn't hit him with much....
    oh and i forgot the non boxers who always see every punch thrown landing, cuz they know ****
     
    Zerwas1, Aug 2, 2009
    Zerwas1, Aug 2, 2009
    #8
  9. Toney

    Toney Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,744
    2
    Nov 29, 2004
    Thats right! :yep
     
    Toney, Aug 2, 2009
    Toney, Aug 2, 2009
    #9
  10. Gsand

    Gsand Active Member Full Member

    1,407
    0
    Dec 13, 2004
    lol, thats pretty much exactly on the money. how many idiots does it take to stop a fight? more than one apparently.
     
    Gsand, Aug 2, 2009
    Gsand, Aug 2, 2009
    #10
  11. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    241
    Sep 28, 2007
    :asskiss
    This content is protected
     
    Hatesrats, Aug 2, 2009
    Hatesrats, Aug 2, 2009
    #11
  12. Ricky369

    Ricky369 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,468
    144
    Feb 16, 2008
    Check the end of the fight again. That was even worst.
    The doctor asked him: You can't see when blood gets there or you can't see thru the eye at all???
    Campbell: The blood.
    Doc: I can't stop the fight unless you can't see through the eye.
    Campbell: OK. Then I can't see.
     
    Ricky369, Aug 2, 2009
    Ricky369, Aug 2, 2009
    #12
  13. Toney

    Toney Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,744
    2
    Nov 29, 2004
    :rofl
     
    Toney, Aug 2, 2009
    Toney, Aug 2, 2009
    #13
  14. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    26,390
    2
    Mar 13, 2007
    Dominate might be the wrong word . . . but still Bradley got all the rounds.
     
    psychopath, Aug 2, 2009
    psychopath, Aug 2, 2009
    #14
  15. truushot

    truushot Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,320
    1
    Jun 21, 2009
    It seems clear that Bradley won the first three rounds. The second was close, the first and third even prior to the butt Bradley was winning easily.
     
    truushot, Aug 2, 2009
    truushot, Aug 2, 2009
    #15
Page 1 of 3