Would a younger Maskaev have beaten Peter?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Cruiser1, Aug 2, 2009.

  1. boxingwizard

    boxingwizard Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    4,853
    Likes Received:
    1
    I don't think so, Maskaev would've gotten KO'd around the time of those string of KO losses, Maskaev doesn't do well against wild brawlers he can't take out. The Corey Sanders fight was a perfect example of that. But I do agree that Maskaev had the skills to beat Peter, Maskaev was beating Peter before getitng KO'd.
     
  2. Cruiser1

    Cruiser1 Champion Emeritus Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2005
    Messages:
    4,622
    Likes Received:
    2
    Peter was ahead on the scorecards but that's neither here nor there.
     
  3. gorgse

    gorgse Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    1,393
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well, I don't think the 1999 Maskaev was prime... He was less wound up in the ring and a better ring tactition around 2007ish. In the Peter loss he pretty much didn't train and was in bed rest leading up to the fight, he really shoudln't have fought. But if he didn't he woud have been stripped of the belt, yet he still gave Peter a decent fight. Take away the bad back, shitty cardo, the extra weight, wasting muscle and rusty skillset from not properly sparring, and I'd think you have a great argument that Maskaev would have toasted Peter in the ring.
     
  4. exnihilo

    exnihilo Karma Disaster Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2009
    Messages:
    1,121
    Likes Received:
    2
    who fckng cares. he is sliced bread..