Pacquiao is trying to buy a belt.....link below.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Capitan, Aug 2, 2009.


  1. Thinman

    Thinman Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,474
    3
    Aug 12, 2005
    The article has to do more with the way that many boxers have been ranked by all these ABC organizations in the past, and the reporter also talks about how Pac all of a sudden became the number one contender in the rankings of the WBO. In other words, how the corrupted organizations that rule boxing operate.......

    It is sad that many people come to this board and don't know how to read.... Sorry, but I can't help you with that.... you are on your own.....

    ps.
    You are doing fine.... they (The ABC organizations) count on you and you have not disapointed them....
     
  2. Windigo

    Windigo Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,131
    3
    Jun 22, 2009
    **** You!

    I said the one thing I agree with the WBO on is that the title must be on the line. I don't defend the rest of the **** so don't put ****ing words in my mouth just because you cant address my point you nuthugging *******. If you cant address my point don't address it at all. Dont ****ing put words in my mouth.

    I dont care if if he was fighting some guy from the ****ing stands. If he fights in the WW division the ****ing title should be on the line. On that I agree with the WBO.
     
  3. Da Chin Chekka

    Da Chin Chekka Chi-Town!!! Full Member

    3,376
    0
    Jun 6, 2009

    How in the hell can Pac be ranked number 1?:huh

    The article said it all, if you pay enough thats how.

    You can't tell me that you think Pac should be ranked no 1:-(
     
  4. Da Chin Chekka

    Da Chin Chekka Chi-Town!!! Full Member

    3,376
    0
    Jun 6, 2009

    WHY WHY WHY WHY, the racial **** all the time!!!:huh
     
  5. Da Chin Chekka

    Da Chin Chekka Chi-Town!!! Full Member

    3,376
    0
    Jun 6, 2009
    Do you think that Pac should be ranked no 1 by the WBO?
     
  6. Thinman

    Thinman Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,474
    3
    Aug 12, 2005
    No, I am not trying to put words in your mouth, but you don't understand the reason why the reporter is saying what he is saying.... you just hate Cotto or love Pac too much that you can't see the real point of the reporter....

    I think you are the nuthugger, not me...... you should know that only ranked contenders should claim the right to fight for a title, and that's what the article is about..... so if you agree that the title should be on the line just because the WBO says so.... and all of a sudden they ranked Pac as number 1 at WW..... then you are an idiot.... I think you are in the wrong forum, but you haven't notice that.....

    Take a ****ing reading comprehension course.... it will help you next time.

    By the way.... did I hit a nerve?????
     
  7. stormy

    stormy Live and Learn Full Member

    3,912
    133
    Mar 17, 2009
    so rank pacman where then??... 10-50 perhaps??? and dont have the fight till he has proved himself???.......hes a current p4p number 1 elite fighter ffs!! so anything should and must be done to accommodate him and Cotto in making this fight happen.Corruption exists in many forms i will agree,but this is the first time ive heard it said when 2 exceptional fighters agree to fight.

    get over the small issues and realise that both teams want that fight and the sanctioning body is accomadating them. and making it happen.....its in the interest of all the parties concerned to sign this fight up so whats the problem?? poor Cotto getting hard deal huh?? he ****en signed the deal did he not? Pacman has to fight him yet....and the weight wont be the biggest worry for either fighter come fight night.....wise up ffs
     
  8. Powerman55

    Powerman55 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,295
    0
    Nov 26, 2008
    We need more people like this on esb. Debates with facts instead of just writing brainwashed cr*p. Great post.
     
  9. Thinman

    Thinman Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,474
    3
    Aug 12, 2005

    It is not my business if Cotto put his title on the line or not.... all what I was saying is that people talk bs without knowing or understanding the real situation..... many people come here and post their opinion and they blame somebody else if there is something that doesn't fit their purpose....

    Cotto has the right as a boxer to not put his title on the line if he didn't want to..... regardless of what you or I think.....

    This thread is about an article written by a reporter, who disagree with the ABC organizations and he stated his reasons why.... Does he is right???.... in my opinion he is right...

    I agree with the reporter, and this has nothing to do with Pac.... this is a problem that has been debated for so many years.... an issue that also posters on this board have discussed.....

    Try to check the archives of this forum if you can, and you will find that posters have discussed this topic before, and I would say that unanimously all of them have agreed that all these ABC organizations are corrupted.....

    So the questions is .... why is it that now some people don't like that somebody talks about the same thing again??????

    By the way the fight is a go... the only discusion here is that the WBO is abusing its power and with that is trying to screw one of the boxers involved.... WHY NOT LET THEM NEGOCIATE ON THEIR OWN????
     
  10. kadyo

    kadyo Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,771
    3
    May 12, 2007
    Solid post bro.
     
  11. Da Chin Chekka

    Da Chin Chekka Chi-Town!!! Full Member

    3,376
    0
    Jun 6, 2009
    Absolutely nothing and I mean nothing is stopping them from fighting. If they wanna fight it will happen. I have seen many fighters give up a belt just to fight somebody, so really the belt don't mean ****.
    This content is protected
     
  12. maracho

    maracho Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,137
    1
    Mar 17, 2007
    I should say that I did not write that post but copied and pasted from three different ones in about five minutes times.

    But thank you





    Oh and thinman hardly anyone is trying to side with the abcs and you know it. we are are just mad that the hater put years of this same kind of abuse all on Manny but you know that to so what is your agenda? Oscar was/is king of rippoff rankings and put in the top three at 154 by every abc all the way to his retirement but no writers ever said anything. A fair and ballanced writer without an agenda would have used more examples.
     
  13. maracho

    maracho Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,137
    1
    Mar 17, 2007
    Whats wrong, did I ruffle your hating hobby?

    Oh and WHY WHY WHY WHY, the sexual desensitization all the time!!!
     
  14. thewoo

    thewoo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,769
    4
    Mar 3, 2005

    Would you stop going on about what weight he was at before. That has nothing to do with anything.
     
  15. radab

    radab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,721
    1
    Dec 14, 2008
    Manny Pacquiao

    the Ted DiBiase of boxing