How do you feel about Cotto's 147 belt being on the line?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by radab, Aug 3, 2009.

  1. radab

    radab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2008
    Messages:
    7,721
    Likes Received:
    1
    A lot of us are split over this, so lets do a poll to see where we all stand
     
  2. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2007
    Messages:
    79,438
    Likes Received:
    2,647
    imo fair.

    what would be unfair is if Pacquiao wasn't allowed to fight for a title at a catchweight when all these other guys like Oscar de la Hoya, Julio Cesar Chavez, Bernard Hopkins, Meldrick Taylor, Pernell Whitaker, Terry Norris, Sugar Ray Leonard, Thomas Hearns, etc. were allowed to do it.
     
  3. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2007
    Messages:
    26,390
    Likes Received:
    2
    Fair.

    Cotto is the one who asked for 145 and since it is well within the welter limit . . . there's no reason why it shouldn't be on the line.
     
  4. Critic

    Critic Limited Edition Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2008
    Messages:
    3,612
    Likes Received:
    3
    fair! which one would you choose? 12M$ or WBO belt?
     
  5. CarlesX7

    CarlesX7 Shit got real! Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    13,209
    Likes Received:
    292
    Well, it's not exactly fair, but not in any way ridiculous. It is within the welterweight limit. I just don't like catchweights, especially concerning title fights.

    My view is this: If my best weight was 147 and I got a title at that weight, I wouldn't want to be forced to defend that title at a lower weight limit. Even if I was challenged by the world's p4p #1 and the biggest draw in the sport. Cotto is a big draw himself and it's not that he doesn't have money or other good options. So if I was Cotto and I knew Pac wants the "paper belt" to get a title in another division, I'd use that to make him fight me at 147.

    Sorry Radab, can't vote on this one!
     
  6. radab

    radab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2008
    Messages:
    7,721
    Likes Received:
    1




    i should have just put fair or uinfair - my got carried away
     
  7. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2007
    Messages:
    60,376
    Likes Received:
    242
    I could give a ****, I just want the fight to be 12 rds.
    If the leather belt with a plaque is on the line so be it.
     
  8. dhenzrae

    dhenzrae A Proud Noypi Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    7,856
    Likes Received:
    0
    Seconded
     
  9. CarlesX7

    CarlesX7 Shit got real! Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    13,209
    Likes Received:
    292
    I hear you, but the term "allowed" isn't accurate. All those guys you mentioned had opponents that agreed to fight at a catchweight. Nobody told Pac "you're not allowed to fight at a catchweight for a title", he just had to find someone with a belt that would agree to that.
     
  10. elTerrible

    elTerrible TeamElite General Manager Full Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2006
    Messages:
    11,392
    Likes Received:
    18
    If he wants the belt then he should fight at 147.

    But **** the belt anyway. Cotto doesnt deserve that belt, it belongs to Clottey.
     
  11. ABN3R

    ABN3R ¡Acho! A mi plín Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2009
    Messages:
    522
    Likes Received:
    0

    I was one, that did care. At this point i don't give a $h!t. Cotto and Pac just fight.
     
  12. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2007
    Messages:
    79,438
    Likes Received:
    2,647
    well noone put a gun on Cotto's head to make him accept the catchweight.If you're gonna agree to the catchweight, then you have a responsibility to bring everything you can to the table to make the fight as big and meaningful as possible. Cotto can't agree to fight at 145, but not put his title on the line. Its either you don't agree to the catchweight in the first place, or agree to it and put your title on the line. Cotto wants the big payday but doesn't want Pacquiao to win the title? Doesn't make sense.
     
  13. Carlos Primera

    Carlos Primera Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2007
    Messages:
    7,114
    Likes Received:
    4
    i'm kind of split on the issue to be honest. keep in mind that 145 lbs is inside the welter weight limit, so technically the belt can be put on the line. on the other hand, cotto is contractually obligated to come in at 145 instead of coming exactly on the limit as he usually does, which in theory should be a handicap to balance out pac moving up in weight. aaaarrrrrggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhcluster!!! it's a cluster **** because of all the technicalities.
     
  14. Carlos Primera

    Carlos Primera Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2007
    Messages:
    7,114
    Likes Received:
    4
    either way, critics will find a way to diminish what ever the result of the fight.
     
  15. radab

    radab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2008
    Messages:
    7,721
    Likes Received:
    1
    Personally, i believe, that it's bollocks

    Its just a stupid trinket, but still, it shouldn't be up for grabs

    If Manny wants to come in at 145, then thats fine, but to force Cotto to put the 147 trinket on the line, but tell him he's not allowed to come in at 147, is, frankly, immoral