Nate Cambpell suffered a vitreous hemorrhage

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by eze, Aug 3, 2009.


  1. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004

    Whether it was a NC or TKO. A rematch is in order.

    Nate made the right choice for his career and life. He could very easily of loss vision for the rest of his life had he fought on.
     
  2. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    In other words; THERE WAS NO DAMAGE TO CAMPBELL'S EYE. Shocker..
     
  3. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    Yes. No damage was done to eye he just suffered a hemorrage :patsch

    If he would of fought on, he very likely would of loss all vision for the rest of his life.
     
  4. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    :boohoo
     
  5. janeschicken

    janeschicken hard work! deadicayshin! Full Member

    20,570
    19
    Nov 10, 2007
    http://www.theeyecenter.com/educational/51c.htm

    Treatment

    Initial treatment may be observation alone. Minor hemorrhages often clot and resolve on their own over time. Unfortunately, it may take months for full visual recovery from a vitreous hemorrhage. Current research has produced drugs that can dissolve the vitreous gel inside the eye and may dramatically reduce the recovery time. These drugs are currently in the investigational stage and are awaiting FDA approval.

    For more severe and debilitating vitreous hemorrhage, a vitrectomy may be performed. A vitrectomy is a surgical procedure that removes the vitreous gel and the blood from inside the eye. After the vitreous is removed, the surgeon will refill the eye with a special saline solution that closely resembles the natural vitreous fluid in the eye. [Recovery from the procedure will take up to 6 weeks and complete vision recovery will take a little longer.

    :huh
     
  6. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004

    Dude what's your issue? You want fighters to risk their vision?

    I know that fighters risk their life in the ring but there's a point where its too much.

    Suffering from pain and discomfort and quiting is one thing.


    Knowing that you can go blind for the rest of your life is the time to quit the fight.
     
  7. Goose

    Goose Russian oligarch Full Member

    8,207
    5,565
    Mar 2, 2005
    Campbell was right, and the referee was wrong. Very simple.
    Nobody here on ESB could have assessed the damage that was done to his eye, only Campbell could have and the doctors there.

    fight should have been a No Decision or a rematch should be in order.
     
  8. janeschicken

    janeschicken hard work! deadicayshin! Full Member

    20,570
    19
    Nov 10, 2007
    Can you imagine if roles were reversed, and it was Bradley who had quit? It would be like the Guzman weigh-in all over again, and we'd hear about yet another injustice to the world of Nate Campbell.
     
  9. Jackolythe

    Jackolythe Active Member Full Member

    742
    0
    Jan 6, 2007
    Campbell took a big hit with the way he acted in his last fight. Technically, he is correct. A no contest is in order.

    However, I think a vast number of his fans will no longer support him. He talks the talk and walks it retartedly.
     
  10. JuanMa

    JuanMa business as usual Full Member

    3,448
    0
    Jun 26, 2009
    I can respect that from Campbell a rematch is necessary i feel for both parties.
     
  11. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    26,390
    2
    Mar 13, 2007
    I was saying that all along . . . the ref ****ed up. :deal
     
  12. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    LMAO!.. You sound like Nate Campbell up in here with all this fake MELODRAMA. :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl
     
  13. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    You sound like a complete **** right now.

    Seriously, whats your issue? Your normally not like this..
     
  14. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    Theres an issue.

    We all know the head butt is the reason, but there's no true proof that his eye was messed up because of it..
     
  15. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    242
    Sep 28, 2007
    It sucks to be Campbell, But Bradley needs to move on.