1. Manny Pacquiao 2. Juan Manuel Marquez 3. Bernard Hopkins 4. Shane Mosley 5. Miguel Cotto 6. Paul Williams 7. Chad Dawson 8. Tomasz Adamek 9. Wladimir Klitschko 10. Juan Manuel Lopez and yes i think adamek is more deserving than donaire
I love Adamek, but he isn't top 10 till he beats Cunningham and CW beltholders, Hopkins, Dawson or somebody from HW top 5-10
All these lists just go to show that Chad Dawson is the most overrated fighter in boxing today!! A fighter that hasn't even proven himself to be the best in a division devoid of depth (granted not his fault B-Hop wont fight him)....who went life and death with Johnson (I had it a draw) and has 2 wins over a past it Antonio Tarver who wasn't great when he was peak!!! Good win over Adamek but there isn't much on that resume to me. I can't see how anyone could possibly have him much over the likes of Kessler, Klits, Abraham, Pavlik, Bradley, Soto, Valero, Donaire, Darchinyan etc other than the fact he's American and undefeated!!! Granted he looks talented but that really isn't enough for me!!
can't put mayweather yet coz "technically" he's still inactive until the pbf-jmm fight... my top 5 PAC JMM B-HOP SSM COTTO
There's a difference between Pavlik, who is dragging his heels, delaying, and not fighting many potentially dangerous opponents and the Klitschkos, who have fought pretty much everyone there is in their weight class.
Chad Dawson is more than deserving to be on the P4P list. It is completly irrelavent that you scored Dawson/Johnson a draw. He won the fight that is why he is undefeated. He beat Glenn Johnson and everybody from myself to Dougie Fischer will agree.
Furthermore, if you consider Dawson's wins over Glenn Johnson and Antonio Tarver as nothing can you please explaiin to me who Kessler, Abraham, and Donaire and Valero have beat that make them more deserving than Dawson?
they dont have much competition but thats not their fault.. Hw division isn't the most important in boxing...how did u come to that conclusion?