Which of these statements best describes Prince Naseem Hamed?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by El Cepillo, Aug 5, 2009.


  1. exnihilo

    exnihilo Karma Disaster Full Member

    1,121
    2
    Jul 17, 2009
  2. El Cepillo

    El Cepillo Baddest Man on the Planet Full Member

    17,221
    4
    Aug 29, 2008
    Such a category doesn't exsist.

    Good/Very Good/Great

    There is nothing inbetween.
     
  3. AndrewFFC

    AndrewFFC Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,501
    3
    Jun 12, 2009
    I feel you can be elite but not ATG. In that category I would place Hamed.
     
  4. BADINTENTIONS2

    BADINTENTIONS2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,073
    0
    Feb 16, 2008

    he would need to have beaten an elite fighter then...and to be an ATG he would've needed to do it consistently. he didnt do that.
     
  5. Two Shakes

    Two Shakes Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,927
    176
    Sep 7, 2008
    Agreed :good

    On a seperate note.
    Hamed was way past his best when he fought Berrera,if Poison could stop Berrera a prime Hamed would have decapapitated him.
     
  6. lolb

    lolb Active Member Full Member

    1,158
    0
    Nov 26, 2008
    Somewhere between A and B.

    One of the hardest punching featherweights of all time and one of the most exciting fighters of all time.

    Just a shame he gave it up after the loss to Barrera.

    I dont count the one fight he had after, as that was not the same fighter.
     
  7. AndrewFFC

    AndrewFFC Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,501
    3
    Jun 12, 2009
    Meh, the Klitschko's will not have faced and beaten anyone 'elite' and yet they will probably be remembered as such.
     
  8. Damo1712

    Damo1712 Boss Full Member

    1,280
    0
    Jan 6, 2009
    went with C, id put him in HOF tho which is based on his entertainment value more so than quality of opposition. I wouldnt be surprised if it happened in the next 5 yrs
     
  9. Rico Spadafora

    Rico Spadafora Master of Chins Full Member

    45,372
    3,783
    Feb 20, 2008

    I got news for you Hamed will NEVER be in the Hall Of Fame.
     
  10. BADINTENTIONS2

    BADINTENTIONS2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,073
    0
    Feb 16, 2008
    thats because they both came back from losses to reign.

    hamed will always be judged harshly because he never even tried.

    that in itself clearly makes him not even close to elite. he was exciting and talented..but so is zab judah. i actually think these two have a lot in common.
     
  11. BADINTENTIONS2

    BADINTENTIONS2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,073
    0
    Feb 16, 2008
    jesus christ i'm agreeing with rico...
     
  12. Rico Spadafora

    Rico Spadafora Master of Chins Full Member

    45,372
    3,783
    Feb 20, 2008

    see, that is not such a bad thing. :lol::good
     
  13. Damo1712

    Damo1712 Boss Full Member

    1,280
    0
    Jan 6, 2009
    :huh He was 35-0, didnt exactly have a lot of warrior style fights so there wasnt any burn out, he was 27 y.o.
    Hamed's greatest asset was his confidence fueled by his near delusional belief that 'Allah' had everything planned out for him. He believed he couldnt be beat which is why the loss ****ed him up mentally.
    Nevertheless, in no way would i detract from barrera's performance by saying Hamed was 'way past his best'
     
  14. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    I'd say a combination of 2 and 5.

    He was a very, very good fighter, but exposed at the very top.

    And he was carefully matched at times. Plenty of former champions on his resume - as opposed to current.
     
  15. Damo1712

    Damo1712 Boss Full Member

    1,280
    0
    Jan 6, 2009
    Barry McGuigan got in so he's the benchmark I use to measure whether or not HOF. However, McGuigan never got done for drink driving after breaking every bone in someones body:think