How come Cotto vs Jenning was the undercard of Main event Pavlik vs Rubio?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by rayhogan, Aug 5, 2009.


  1. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    22,780
    350
    Aug 26, 2006
    I was thinking about that ppv and i want to know why was Pavlik vs Rubio in the main event while Cotto vs Jenning was in the undercard? Cotto is clearly the bigger draw then Pavlik. This is like imo a slap in the face to Cotto by freaking Bob Arum.
     
  2. PIPO23

    PIPO23 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,892
    6,249
    May 18, 2006
    you're right for once in your life; Michael Jenkins and Miguel Cotto shoulda been da main event!!
     
  3. JETSKI

    JETSKI Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,758
    38
    Aug 26, 2004
    Thats your opinion.:yep

    Cotto is done. If Clotty had 1/2 a brain, we wouldn't even be talking about Cotto now. Pacquiao will finish him off for good.

    While on the other hand, Pavlik vs Williams has FOTY potential.
     
  4. BADINTENTIONS2

    BADINTENTIONS2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,073
    0
    Feb 16, 2008
    its naaive to say cotto is done
     
  5. Swann

    Swann I'm secretly Marc. Shh... Full Member

    1,222
    0
    May 11, 2009
    cotto is 1-0 against future HOFers.

    when pavlik stepped up and faced his first HOFer, he got shut out for 12 rounds. :lol:

    cotto's only loss is extremely dubious considering margarito attempted to cheat in his next fight when he had much less incentive. pavlik's loss was clear cut... unless you believe him when he says he was suffering from a fever and was about to die before the fight. :nut
     
  6. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    22,780
    350
    Aug 26, 2006
    Thats my opinion? It's a clear cut fact. Look at the ppv numbers and ticket sells that aren't cheap. <<<<<Cotto is the bigger draw.
     
  7. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    26,390
    2
    Mar 13, 2007
    Isn't that a double header?
     
  8. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    22,780
    350
    Aug 26, 2006
    Lol. Atleast Cotto didn't make excuses of why he lost to Margarito. Pavlik excuse is laughable cause i knew this will come cause how can he not make excuses when a 43 year old like Hopkins beat the crap out of him?
     
  9. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    22,780
    350
    Aug 26, 2006
    Yup but Pavlik vs Rubio was the last fight in which is really the main event. It should have been Cotto vs Jenning as the main event cause Cotto is the bigger draw then Pavlik.
     
  10. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    26,390
    2
    Mar 13, 2007
    Pavlik vs Rubio is a weak PPV event and so with Cotto vs Jennings . . . so the two fights compliments each other.

    They probably decided to put the Pavlik fight last because it is in the heavier weight class. Cotto is coming in from a loss at that time.
     
  11. evalistinho

    evalistinho Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,476
    2
    Feb 27, 2008
    Maybe because Pavlik was the champ he was the main event since Cotto and Jennings were fighting for a vacant title.
     
  12. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    22,780
    350
    Aug 26, 2006
    Dude Pavlik was coming in from a loss as well lol. And so what about heavy weight class? Thats a terrible excuse.
     
  13. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    22,780
    350
    Aug 26, 2006
    So? Just because Pavlik was the champ don't mean he should be in the main event.
     
  14. kracka81

    kracka81 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,142
    1
    May 1, 2008
    yeah but bob arum was in ytown the only thing i didnt like was miguel diaz was cottos cut man maybe cause every one knew rubio didnt stand a chance
     
  15. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    26,390
    2
    Mar 13, 2007
    Yeah but that was planned as Pavlik show in his hometown. :D