which of these fighters would you consider a quitter and why?

FO SHERRRRR:hi:

 

I go for PRINCE NASEEM HAMED!!!

Any we all know why!!!!

 

DLH had to quit because he could no longer fight the last two rounds. He was stumbling on his feet. He couldn't defend himself. Had it been any other fighter the ref would have stopped that fight earlier but because it was Oscar it was getting dangerous. So yeah he had to quit.

 

Good one:good

 

He left the oven on at the hotel and wanted to make sure he didn't burn the place down

 

Nate.

 

Roberto Duran "No mas"

 

All of the above. STR8 bitches, the lot.

 

the one that really stands out is Cotto. No matter what his nuthuggers say he flat out quit.

Someof those guys you listed were 'injured' when they quit but I guess it is still quitting but not as bad as just saying no mas with no injury.

 

Duran. Nothing was wrong with him. he was just frustrated and gave up.

 

:yep:yep

 

I think a fighter would have to quit more than one time for me to consider them a quitter overall, and to the best of my knowledge all the fighters listed have only quit one time in their careers. If I am wrong about that let me know.

 

At the moment, Junior Witter.... Acelino Frietas and Nate Campbell. Witter and Frietas was no suprise, but Campbell?? I saw no reason for him to quit against Bradley. No doubt, that if the fight continued, it was highly possible that Campbell's cut would have gotten worst. That is only because, on that particular day... Bradley had Campbell from the opening bell. When Campbell cut Diaz, Diaz did not quit.... Daiz lost, but he fought on like a warrior. Campbell was looking for the easy way out in hopes it would be a no-contest. :nono

 

Has Witter's injury been confirmed (or rather, corroborated) by his camp?

 

I saw the Witter replay on FNF...that ****in' dude quit.

Its not like he was completely getting his ass kicked either.

He was less frustrated than Duran and the guy just simply said **** it.

I go with Witter