You don't have to do it at a catchweight. Fitzsimmons could make the modern 147 lb limit without trouble if you prefer. I'm trying to think of the top line cruiserweights Hearns knocked out....can't though.
i think Hearns beats him possibly a late stoppage by modern rules. Fitz was tough and would try t counter Tommy as he attacked but i think Hearns was abit too quick and tall for him.
I would be inclined to go with Fitzsimmons here. Both these guys are teriffic pound for pound punchers as you know but Fitzsimmons was definitely the more durable of the two. Don't forgett that he was taking punches from the best heavyweights of his era with 4 oz gloves. Simply put it comes down to what breaks first.
I don't know about that. Fitz was coming in at around 170 in catchweight fights and probably understated or overstated his weight prior to some fights. Adam Pollack thought that Fitzsimmons could have made the junior middleweight limit under curent weigh in rules.
He weighed in at around 150 for Jack Dempsey. Nex day weigh in, he could boil of and re-hydrate okay. Weight making is the one are boxing has inarguable advanced in. Unfortunately.
He could do it: A. At that point in his career. B. If that is what he actualy weighed at that point. One thing that quickly becomes aparent when researching that period is that the published weights of fighters were often BS. For example when Fitzsimmons fought Gus Ruhlin his published weight was 155 lbs while some sources indicate that he was really 170. John L Sullivan's weight has been given as everything from 175 lbs to "230 lbs in fine physical condition".
Yeah, I read that these weights are often off, but the Dempsey fight was for the title. Was the MW limit then not 156? So at most he weighed that (and with it's being a title match, in all likelyhood he weighed 150). That being the case, I think it's likely that he could get down to 147 under modern rules, with modern assistance at weightmaking.
Fitz would win via Ko. Remember he flatten heavies, and took shots from heavies. Hearns was an offensive machine, but lacked durability.
In the title fight against Dempsey at least he would have to have weighed inside the middleweight limit. If Dempsey had even suspected that Fitz was cheating with the weigh in he would not have gone ahead with the fight and as champion he held the whip hand. I do recall however that after the fight Dempsey said disparagingly that Fitz was "a boiled down heavyweight". So by the standards of his day he was doing a Tommy Hearns to make weight.
Well under the rules of that era, a boiled down HW could be 158lbs. I don't imagine him having trouble taking of the extra weight. Whether he could do it or not, frightening prospect.