what is the difference between the past greats and the modern greats

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by trowell22, Aug 7, 2009.


  1. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006
    I'm not involved in this debate, but I do want to say that I could easily imagine Danny Lopez beating Morales. That right hand was one hell of an equalizer, and Danny did go 27 rounds with Sanchez.
     
  2. Thinman

    Thinman Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,474
    3
    Aug 12, 2005
    Yes, Danny had that kind of power that could end a fight like that.... Not a surprise to me..... but for many posters that never saw Coloradito, it might look like that.
     
  3. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006
    I have honestly never seen any other fighter hit a guy with what looked like a nothing punch, and then the guy stays down for 3-4 minutes! Danny also knew his identity; he knew the right hand would make things happen, and that made him pretty good at finding a way to land it. I can see Danny winning one in a trilogy with Morales.
     
  4. Thinman

    Thinman Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,474
    3
    Aug 12, 2005
    BTW, you are invited to debate..... you have knowledge of the topic...and your contribution is appreciated... at least I appreciate that.....

    Let's say that I am in a mission and I want to see if in reallity what people claim about living in a more modern world, actually creates or develops better boxers than before..... If the theory is right we should see the results at least every decade or every two decades.... right????

    So lets see if they are right..... my opinion is different, but lets see.....
     
  5. Thinman

    Thinman Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,474
    3
    Aug 12, 2005
    Yes, he was great.... and he knew that his punch could make the difference (save his a$$) once he was in trouble....:yep
     
  6. trowell22

    trowell22 Member Full Member

    272
    0
    Aug 6, 2009
    hey man that's your take, i would not argue with that but I call it as I've seen it.
    then you watch erik's fights, preferably the barrera and pacquiao fights and see how he deals with brawlers and in and outs
    and by god pacquiao and barrera are faster than the great gomez.

    and for me it's still a toss up man, I wanted to see that fight...:good
     
  7. The Wanderer

    The Wanderer Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,815
    23
    Mar 28, 2008
    The ultimate difference between the greats of yesterday and the greats of today is that the greats of yesterday have proven themselves and stood the test of time. A lot of guys being used in those sorts of threads are among the best and best remembered of all time.

    Even assuming that an active boxer will indeed turn out to be great and not stumble along the way, (which happens all the ****ing time, anyone here remember all the people who were ready to list Mijares as an ATG?) trust me, there can be a huge difference between being the best of a generation and one of the best of all time.

    For example, Oscar was one of the best welterweights in the past 15 years. (I never liked Oscar and I cheered my heart out when Pacquiao beat the crap out of him, but I'll give him that much). But does anyone here, anyone at all want to take Oscar in a bout over Sugar Ray Leonard? Hearns? Robinson? Duran? Yet up until Oscar spent the last 4 rounds running from Trinidad plenty of guys would have told you he was going to be one of the greatest welters ever.

    As much as people sometimes overrate classic fighters, it's just as likely, if not more so, that people get caught up in the fighters they're watching now and start losing perspective. Anyone remember last year when some people were saying Margarito beats Tommy Hearns? Yeah, if you don't want to make a fool out of yourself comparing a modern boxer to the greats of the past, wait until the modern guy's career is over or almost over before you start saying who would win what.
     
  8. Freedom

    Freedom Guest

    Three rounds is the difference, championship rounds they used to call them. What a shame.:-(
     
  9. trowell22

    trowell22 Member Full Member

    272
    0
    Aug 6, 2009
    wow good point!!!:admin

    thing is you don't have to see it SO literally:hey:patsch
     
  10. Thinman

    Thinman Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,474
    3
    Aug 12, 2005
    Trowell,

    This is the list of modern boxers who fought mostly during the '70s and '80s who have been inducted to the IBHOF. Some of them fought during the '60s and '70s and some during the '80s and '90s and I stated that... Some of them probably shouldn't be there.... I heard for example people saying that Ken Norton shouldn't have been inducted.... None the less, these are no bums.....

    This content is protected

    Alexis Arguello
    Wlifred Benitez
    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    Miguel Canto
    Antonio Cervantes
    Bobby Chacon
    Jeff Chandler
    Pipino Cuevas
    Roberto Duran
    Jeff Fenech
    George Foreman
    Joe Frazier
    Khaosai Galaxy
    Victor Galindez
    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    Marving Hagler
    Larry Holmes
    This content is protected

    Ray Leonard
    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    Carlos Monzon
    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    Ken Norton
    This content is protected

    Carlos Palomino
    Eusebio Pedroza
    Aaron Pryor
    Dwight Muhammad Qawi
    Edwin Rosario
    Matthew Saad Muhammad
    Salvador Sanchez
    Michael Spinks
    This content is protected

    Daniel Zaragoza
    Carlos Zarate

    Now lets see your list of the '90s and '00s and lets compare them.

    I understand that many are still active, and some just retired, but lets include those who have merits and we think they will be inducted to the IBHOF