How does pacquiao become P4P ATG No1?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by mughalmirza786, Aug 10, 2009.

  1. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee VIP Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2006
    Messages:
    51,463
    Likes Received:
    17,052
    why does he have to move up to 154 to make him higher on the list. That's ridiculous.

    Fighting Cotto and Mayweather and calling it a career is the smart thing to do.
     
  2. smitty_son408

    smitty_son408 J ust E njoy T his S hit Full Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2008
    Messages:
    6,030
    Likes Received:
    12
    This content is protected
     
  3. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2006
    Messages:
    38,291
    Likes Received:
    23

    Funny because its true, in fact arguably Pac has accomplished more at 30 than SRR did at 30.
     
  4. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2004
    Messages:
    36,485
    Likes Received:
    21,075
    :lol:

    Now thats comedy.
     
  5. McGarnacle

    McGarnacle New Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2009
    Messages:
    36
    Likes Received:
    0
    they thought this despite the fact the most people think JMM beat Pacquiao both times. Not to mention that Floyd is undefeated. Pretty sure no one considered him even top 3 when floyd was champion as Calazaghe was still fighting as well.
     
  6. 1lehudson

    1lehudson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2004
    Messages:
    12,789
    Likes Received:
    2
    To be honest..You cat do it anymore..It would take some one fighting 100 times min and beatting pretty much every elite fighter in his reach...Fair or not thats what its going to take.
     
  7. 1lehudson

    1lehudson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2004
    Messages:
    12,789
    Likes Received:
    2
    At 30 SRR was 123-1 ahh moron:patsch
     
  8. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2006
    Messages:
    38,291
    Likes Received:
    23

    different eras in boxing, if a loss didnt mean so much in boxing today or atleast meant as much as it did in those days there would be hundreds of fighters today with just as many fights.
     
  9. 1lehudson

    1lehudson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2004
    Messages:
    12,789
    Likes Received:
    2
    Your right its a different era, In that era Pac never would have fought as a flyweight, and would have had to fight his career at a weight much closer to his walk around weight which would have meant he would have most likely started his career at 122 or 126...PLUS not only was Ray 123-1 he fought and beat EVERYONE he fought at that point and he beat much much better fighters then Pac has....Armstrong alone eats Pac's resume...Armstrong is seen by many as the second greatest fighter of all time, and actually by some as the greatest...Jeez I really dont know why I reply to Pacoron..You cats have NO FREAKING clue. Dude I get it, I get that its a great feeling to have one of your own doing great things, but **** you cats are going WAY overbroad here.:blood
     
  10. smitty_son408

    smitty_son408 J ust E njoy T his S hit Full Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2008
    Messages:
    6,030
    Likes Received:
    12
    Sammy Angott
    Kid Gavilan
    Henry Armstrong
    Carmen Basillio
    Fritzie Zivic
    Gene Fullmer
    Jake LaMotta

    And many other worthy contenders. The # of cab drivers on his resume are almost non existent.

    Ray's resume>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Pac's existence
     
  11. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2004
    Messages:
    36,485
    Likes Received:
    21,075

    Which is exactly the point :good

    People make a big thing about how many divisions Pac has jumped, without truly analysing the quality of his opponants and at what stage they were at in their careers.

    SRR has Pac for quality, quantity and just straight up being the better fighter..which ever way you want to look at it.
     
  12. 1lehudson

    1lehudson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2004
    Messages:
    12,789
    Likes Received:
    2
    Forget man, those guys dont understand much about boxing once you take the talks past pac....Your making your fingers work for nothing...They just dont get it....
     
  13. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2004
    Messages:
    36,485
    Likes Received:
    21,075
    I try my best to ignore it huddy..but sometimes I hope they can learn something once in a while.
     
  14. dangerousity

    dangerousity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    20,253
    Likes Received:
    2,302

    Goes both ways though, Pac weighing the weight on fight night means his opponent would have weighed the same fight night. Maybe instead of fly-WW Pac maybe BW-JMW. Fighters would just rule a weight class or 2 above, MAB & Morales who routinely came in at 140+ on fight night would be JWW, Hattonw ould be a WW/JMW, Cotto would be a JMW-MW.

    123-1 doesnt impress me, he fought every 2 weeks... how many great opponents can you find every 2 weeks? Surely not that many, many were bums....simmilar to what Chavez did. having siad that, what impress me is the no. of great HOF fighters SRR did, which no doubt was a lot and more so than Pac will ever face.
     
  15. snell

    snell FEU-NRMF Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2009
    Messages:
    1,286
    Likes Received:
    0

    old mythical boxers====god :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl


    bosto celtics 70's >>>>>>> lakers of 2009 :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::patsch