The better resume: PBF or JMM?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by KOTF, Aug 16, 2009.


  1. Back Hand Slap

    Back Hand Slap Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,270
    1
    Jul 18, 2009
    Floyd Just. On recent activity i have JMM higher p4p.
     
  2. Asterion

    Asterion Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,459
    20
    Feb 5, 2005
    Mayweather easily.

    JMM has beaten like 9 Top10 contenders in his whole career. Mayweather beat 18.

    JMM doesn't belong to the same category as Floyd, Jones, etc.
     
  3. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007
    Floyd huh outside of Oscar Corrales and Castillo aren't even close to being on the level of Barrera or Manny ..Judah please Gatti please ? Chop chop :lol:
     
  4. pauliemayweathe

    pauliemayweathe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,995
    0
    Dec 27, 2007
    marquez has beat some good fighters but has pac and john who he never won in 3 fights. Floyd has DOMINATED his resume winning titles is 5 divisions and just destroying corrales, gatti, baldo, judah, hatton, hernandez, famoso, chavez 1 handed...he is a far better fighter overall...p4p, head to head or resume
     
  5. pauliemayweathe

    pauliemayweathe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,995
    0
    Dec 27, 2007
    and manny knocked him down 4 times and won both fights and barrera was past it
     
  6. Danny_Rand

    Danny_Rand Slick N Quick Full Member

    9,989
    2
    Jun 28, 2008
    Chop chop nearly chopped Cotto in half. Chop chop was a solid mark.


    Oh and Castillo and Corrales were better then the version of Barrera that Marquez fought,.
     
  7. JoeAverage

    JoeAverage Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,150
    1
    Oct 26, 2008
    How does a loss tell anything about how good a fighter is?

    :huh:huh:huh

    Answer: NOTHING.

    Taylor, RJJ and Calzaghe are all on Lacy's resume. Those three are better than Pavlik's resume combined... does that mean Lacy is better than Pavlik? And so on.. you could easily find a truely bad journeyman with rows of great fighters on his resume.. is he then really good?

    No.

    It is the wins - and nothing else. Losses say nothing at all in favor of the person and should of course not be used to build up the person's resume.
     
  8. JoeAverage

    JoeAverage Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,150
    1
    Oct 26, 2008
    I agree. I find this thread ridiculous and it only exists because of the latino bias on ESB.
     
  9. boxbox

    boxbox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,220
    0
    Feb 4, 2006
    having the balls to fight great fighters but losing doesnt help in anyway. But a win against them will. With that, PBF takes it.
     
  10. rccwilliams

    rccwilliams Sippin' on some sizzurp Full Member

    2,549
    0
    Mar 5, 2009
    I was leaning towards Floyd before i realized he has fought no one of Pacquiao calibre, that coupled with his more recent wins tips it in JMM's favor.
     
  11. Danny_Rand

    Danny_Rand Slick N Quick Full Member

    9,989
    2
    Jun 28, 2008
    JMM lost to Pac twice. You dont count losses. If you did, DLH is the greatest fighter in history.

    Its called a resume. Do you put jobs you were fired at on your resume lol?
     
  12. tliang1000

    tliang1000 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,112
    7
    Aug 18, 2007
    good point. barrera and morales are worn out prositutes by the time marquez fought them.
     
  13. tolindoy

    tolindoy UBESTRIDTE MESTER Full Member

    6,396
    0
    Jan 22, 2009
    wow, pretty impressive post dan....100% agreed...:good
     
  14. simon850

    simon850 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,007
    0
    Dec 7, 2008
    Floyd no doubt, not to say JMM resume isnt good, Floyds is just stronger.
     
  15. tolindoy

    tolindoy UBESTRIDTE MESTER Full Member

    6,396
    0
    Jan 22, 2009
    I want to say JMM coz I really hate floyd......But no matter how i spin it, there's just no way JMM's resume is better than floyd....Just no way...