Froch vs Kessler

Hopefully !

Can't see no reason why it shouldn't be

 

No. Froch is 3rd and Kessler is 1st. By the Ring's rules only in exceptional circumstances can a fight between 1 and 3 be for the title:good.

 

At this moment in time - things can change if they both win.

 

Valid point but we're talking about at the moment, Kos. I wanted to type it in such a way so it was completely clear for 'rockandrollstar'.

Maybe so but the Ring's ranking are as stated at the moment. I don't see how a win over Dirrell will make Froch 2nd, TBH.

 

Losfer we're not talking about at the moment were talking about when they fight !!!!!!

 

No, he asked if they both win their next fights should they fight for it.

 

Refer to post number 6, all. I'm not repeating myself again! **** it actually, I will- a win over Dirrell will not improve Froch's ranking.

 

Don't see why it would, mate- that rule is for long-term injuries and cases like the Klitschko brothers. This is why the Ring title is so good- even people like Darchinyan, who has beaten Mijares (coming off a win against Munoz) and Arce, don't get awarded the belt. You have to earn your ranking and then beat the best. I absolutely love it as a lineal title, TBH.

The only way I can see the rankings changing is if Froch destroys Dirrell and Bute loses against Andrade. That way, as long as Kessler wins, the fight should be for the title:good.

 

Why not?

 

You must have wrote that before I posted my update. It's there for you:good.

 

No, I read it all. Why wouldn't a win over Dirrell put him above Bute? I just want to hear your reasonings for thinking this, thats all. Cheers :thumbsup