Is Miguel Cotto a big welterweight?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by CarlesX7, Aug 18, 2009.


  1. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,645
    Feb 1, 2007
    Light Middle weights rehydrate up to 170 though. Cotto would be a small LMW. He's not a huge WW, just slightly big
     
  2. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Did Clottey honestly look bigger than Cotto to you??
     
  3. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    No, he is not a big ww Carles. He is just a fire hydrant of a ww with great skill. The average size of the ww's is about 5' 10. Cotto look small and thick like Cole from Martin as Martin would say lol...
     
  4. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    22,780
    350
    Aug 26, 2006
    Yup. Look at Clottey body frame.
     
  5. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    As if I need further proof of your ******ation..

    YOU HAVE A LOOK, EINSTEIN. :patsch I'm looking at the fight right ****ing now.

    COTTO IS BIGGER THAN CLOTTEY, IF ONLY THE SAME SIZE. :patsch:patsch:patsch:patsch:patsch
     
  6. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
  7. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    san, would you agree Cotto is only 5'8 but quite stocky?
     
  8. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    I thought he was 5'7.
     
  9. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,905
    3,303
    Jun 30, 2005
    I wouldn't say he's an especially big WW. At least not in terms of dimensions like height and wingspan. His wingspan is quite short compared to some other WWs out there.

    However, he has a stocky frame and rehydrates quite a bit (in the upper 150s), so it's not as if he's a small WW either.

    I'll say he's on the big side at WW. Just not THAT big, like a Williams, Trinidad, or Margarito.
     
  10. Beenie

    Beenie Evolve already! Full Member

    19,105
    42
    Apr 12, 2008
    Considering Cotto fights in an era that includes the likes of Margarito, Cintron, PTP, and Clottey, I hesitate to label him as a big welter. He's an average sized fighter for the weight imo.
     
  11. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    5'7 my bad
     
  12. JMP

    JMP Champion Full Member

    18,768
    21
    Dec 5, 2007
    rayhogan - san rafael is right.....Clottey is much more defined than Cotto and maybe an inch and a half taller, but Cotto looked just as BIG - very thick and sturdy. He's the like the bull of the WW division in that respect, but other things (chin/stamina) prevent him from consistently fighting like one.
     
  13. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    22,780
    350
    Aug 26, 2006
    Lol if you say so. But Cotto is not bigger then Clottey. Clottey is an inch taller (5'8) with a 3 inch reach advantage and his body frame is bigger.
     
  14. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    22,780
    350
    Aug 26, 2006
    I disagree. Clottey has a big body frame. Clottey foehead is large with 3 inch reach advantage and yes he's an inch taller.
     
  15. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    55,255
    9,486
    Jul 28, 2009
    I heard Lampley referring to him as a "very big welterweight" and it did make me do a double take. I'd call him a perfectly sized WW. I think Lampley was slanting things for the Pac/Cotto fight. Maybe not. Maybe that's just Lamp's opinion.