When, if ever has Pacquiao beaten a top fighter in their prime convincingly?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Jeff M, Apr 16, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Page 54 of 61
  1. Jeff M

    Jeff M Future ESB HOF Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2008
    Messages:
    27,003
    Likes Received:
    133
    You've never asked me. In fact, I never even noticed you before.
     
    Jeff M, Aug 19, 2009
    #796
  2. Jeff M

    Jeff M Future ESB HOF Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2008
    Messages:
    27,003
    Likes Received:
    133
    Why can't you handle talking about Pac without bringing up JMM and trying to degrade his record. He fought the lineal champ and #1 contender at 135. Pac fought D. Diaz. Enough said.
     
    Jeff M, Aug 19, 2009
    #797
  3. Jeff M

    Jeff M Future ESB HOF Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2008
    Messages:
    27,003
    Likes Received:
    133
    And some are what we call "paper" champions, as in this case.
     
    Jeff M, Aug 19, 2009
    #798
  4. pare

    pare Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    626
    Likes Received:
    2
    look back in like page 10. and look over posts by others.

    anyway...

    now that i've had the privilege of being noticed by you. can you give the criteria and the examples?
     
    pare, Aug 19, 2009
    #799
  5. pare

    pare Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    626
    Likes Received:
    2
    it's not degrading jmm's record. sure baby fat and grandpa are above david diaz, but not that far above.

    135 was obviously just a stepping stone to get to 140-147 anyway.
     
    pare, Aug 19, 2009
    #800
  6. scatterbrain

    scatterbrain Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2008
    Messages:
    5,867
    Likes Received:
    0
    what is this ruckus you started again, Jeff you twat.
     
    scatterbrain, Aug 19, 2009
    #801
  7. pare

    pare Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    626
    Likes Received:
    2
    Jeff M, still waiting for the criteria of what constitutes a "top fighter in [his] prime" and the examples of fighters who have beaten top fighters in their primes "convincingly".....

    :dead:dead:dead
     
    pare, Aug 19, 2009
    #802
  8. Bazooka

    Bazooka Pimp C Wants 2 Be Me Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2005
    Messages:
    44,390
    Likes Received:
    6
    Lets not get into the Paper champion debate shall we
     
    Bazooka, Aug 19, 2009
    #803
  9. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee VIP Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2006
    Messages:
    51,460
    Likes Received:
    17,050
    i'm 32 years old. I'm in my prime...
     
    DobyZhee, Aug 19, 2009
    #804
  10. kadyo

    kadyo Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2007
    Messages:
    5,771
    Likes Received:
    3
    This content is protected
     
    kadyo, Aug 19, 2009
    #805
  11. kadyo

    kadyo Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2007
    Messages:
    5,771
    Likes Received:
    3
    Hey jeff, just curios but how do you think will a recent valero fare against a pre-mayweather hatton?
     
    kadyo, Aug 19, 2009
    #806
  12. radab

    radab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2008
    Messages:
    7,721
    Likes Received:
    1


    exactly
     
    radab, Aug 19, 2009
    #807
  13. radab

    radab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2008
    Messages:
    7,721
    Likes Received:
    1


    :lol: wtf
     
    radab, Aug 19, 2009
    #808
  14. kadyo

    kadyo Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2007
    Messages:
    5,771
    Likes Received:
    3
    This content is protected
     
    kadyo, Aug 19, 2009
    #809
  15. radab

    radab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2008
    Messages:
    7,721
    Likes Received:
    1


    :lol:

    you and me both know the truth though eh kadyo? :yep
     
    radab, Aug 19, 2009
    #810
Page 54 of 61
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.