Who among Floyd, JMM, Cotto and PAC is the most overpaid and underperforming boxer?

Like shooting ducks in a barrel, eh TA?

 

what are your sources on these numbers?

 

Well if you HAVE to choose one out of the 4 fighters, floyd is a no brainer...:good

 

I don't think any of those guys deserve those titles. If they can draw the crowds then they will be payed accordingly. And all three are exciting to watch in their own rights- whether they are clinical and precise, or explosive and sloppy they all get the job done and leave fans wanting more.:good

It's not a good profession to be in if you don't perform as it can all go pear-shaped after a bad loss... just asked Jeff Lacy. The guy used to be one of the most talked about fighters before he fought Calzaghe..

 

Void

 

i agree with you..

 

the conman himself, fraud..

 

jmm is umderpaid. 6 million would have been fair for marquez's status

 

maybe JMM felt sorry coz PBF's broke!!!

 

wow is floyd so good that u consider jmm a tune up? wow that statement there says a lot about floyd and a lot about you.......

 

so does that make it true? so all of a sudden jmm is a tune up and pac is godzilla lol pac will lose to floyd and you *******s will eat crow and hide...... I have a question for u so would maquez be a tuneup for pac now.... I think not, ur a joke. everyone has there own opinions im sure its ppl here that believe khan and berto would beat floyd does that make it true