Better resume: Calzaghe at 168 or Hopkins at 160?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Stinky gloves, Aug 20, 2009.


  1. tays001

    tays001 ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    15,124
    7
    Mar 6, 2006
    well lacy beat vaderpool faster then b-hop did

    that way of thinking doesn't work for resume either:good
     
  2. tays001

    tays001 ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    15,124
    7
    Mar 6, 2006
    you got the gull to call some one a dope not only to you Expose your lack of knowledge by comparing lispey to kessler

    you start making assumption like well this fighter that fighter a beat beat this fighter that fighter b beat easier. so there for fighter a is better and so is the resume.

    you know absolutly **** about lispey.

    1 how did his career go after the hopkins fight ?

    2 was his career better then kesslers career b4 they bth fought these 2 respected fighters. was he ranked # 1 in the MW division for 2 years. (note kessler was ranked #1 when Joe fought lacy.)

    3. was lispey bigger ,stronger then B-hop. **** he wasn't even a world champion .

    by the way the Ko was sweet. what round was that agian?

    Dam well you know Kessler didn't last as long with joe as Lispey did with B-hop.:yep


    yout a real winner your mother must tell you every day that your the load she should of swalloed :good
     
  3. Danny_Rand

    Danny_Rand Slick N Quick Full Member

    9,989
    2
    Jun 28, 2008
    Hudson compared lispey to Kessler. His rational being that Kessler is a hyped fighter who has yet to accomplish anything.
    How has Kesslers career gone after the Calzaghe fight? How has Lacys? Lacy is done and was beaten worse by Roy Jones. And Kessler has yet to do anything but fight journeymen. The comparison is apt. Kessler won a vacated title against Sartisan. :lol: That means he was gifted that title by the powers that be ****. He has yet to earn anything.
     
  4. tays001

    tays001 ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    15,124
    7
    Mar 6, 2006
    :conf:finger

    kessler did not retire after that fight. neither did lacy.

    a shot lacy was beaten by jones but not worse i belive lacy was more ****ed up at the end of the Calzaghe fight and joe actuall had hin knocked down his corner just didn't stop the fight that time. you see a ko and right away you think it;s a better win you have no grasp of the sweet science nor do you know how to compare 2 fighters. you say the comparrison is appropriate yet give no example of how lipsey is compairable. :-(
     
  5. tays001

    tays001 ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    15,124
    7
    Mar 6, 2006
    hurry up and google,yahoo, or wikki Lispey hell even box rec so you can answer the other 2 questions. :verysad
     
  6. Danny_Rand

    Danny_Rand Slick N Quick Full Member

    9,989
    2
    Jun 28, 2008
    And what does that have to do with the fact that neither one of them accomplished anything of note after fighting Calzaghe. Hell neither one accomplished anything before fighting Calzaghe. I know maybe 2 names on Kesslers record, and not one of them is world champion level. Hell Andrade was getting worked by friggin Bute for a clean sweep UD before he caught him the 12th.
    Both Kessler and Lipsey despite hype have yet to accomplish much of anything in the sport. Kessler was handed a title after he lost to Calslap. His only notable names on his resume are Mundine, Beyer and Andrade. Hell Tito was a better win then Kessler. Tito was P4P number 1, undefeated and considered the favorite against B-hop. Hardly anybody expected Joe Slap to lose to Kessler.

    And I fail to see how a fighters size matters dope.
     
  7. tays001

    tays001 ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    15,124
    7
    Mar 6, 2006
    kessler won 2 world title belt . lispey didn't can you get that you ****ing simple ass *****:patsch
    he was undefeated until meating a fighter ranked in the top 3 p4p rankings lispey didn't(at the time)

    Lacy won a world title and defened it 5 times lispey didn't

    Kessler was actually being picked and had a 50/50 or more shot at beating JOe.

    and yes size does matter just ask.........

    :huh wait never mind you've probbaly never had a girlfriend:yep

    lispey looked extreamly smal compared ot b-hop smaller then DLH.

    and he wasn't as experinced as Kessler either.

    your a simple little **** and im getting bored of playing with you :hi:
     
  8. tays001

    tays001 ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    15,124
    7
    Mar 6, 2006

    yet again you fail to answer the questions.

    2. was his career better then kesslers career b4 they both fought these 2 respected fighters. was he ranked # 1 in the MW division for 2 years. (note kessler was ranked #1 when Joe fought lacy.)



    your answer goes here:good






    3. was lispey bigger ,stronger then B-hop. **** he wasn't even a world champion .

    by the way the Ko was sweet. what round was that agian?



    your answer goes here:good




    Dam well you know Kessler didn't last as long with joe as Lispey did with B-hop.:yep


    yout a real winner your mother must tell you every day that your the load she should of swalloed :good

    hope the instructions were simple enough .
     
  9. Danny_Rand

    Danny_Rand Slick N Quick Full Member

    9,989
    2
    Jun 28, 2008
    Kessler won 2 belts off hand picked paper champs. Sartisan? :lol: Beyer? :lol:
    He was undefeated because he hadnt ****ing fought anyone jackass. Sartisan was undefeated too. Why? Because he was fighting club fighters
    I remember the majority opinion was that Calzaghe was a class above Kessler. 50/50 my ass.

    Tell me, what world champion fighters has Kessler beat in the last 2 years?

    Wow kid you're terrible. Is that the best you could do. :lol: Are you 3?
     
  10. Danny_Rand

    Danny_Rand Slick N Quick Full Member

    9,989
    2
    Jun 28, 2008
    I'd rate Kesslers career slightly better then Lipseys at the time. Kessler had beaten a few paper champions like Mundine and Beyer. But the comparison is extremely close, considering Kessler hasnt accomplished anything else. I mean how bad is it when you are best known for losing to Slappy Joe? :rofl

    So lol? What does that have to do with anything? A prime Bhop knocks Kessler the **** out too. :yep



    Now answer my questions slob. Who would you rank a better when? And undefeated Tito who demolished Joppy, ranked P4P number 1 in the world and considered the betting favorite in the fight, or Mikkel "the club fighters nightmare" Kessler?
     
  11. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    19,216
    2
    Dec 10, 2005
    The Johnson who lost to Hopkins, Sosa, Kiwanuka, Ottke, Vanderpool, Branco, Sheika and didn't beat anyone with a winning record at SMW except one guy who had fought virtually exclusively in the Netherlands Antilles? Hardly. Which was the point, that's the Johnson we're talking about.
     
  12. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    19,216
    2
    Dec 10, 2005
    Go on, have a go at actually addressing the question, you know you want to.
     
  13. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
  14. tays001

    tays001 ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    15,124
    7
    Mar 6, 2006

    you say yousee no names on kessler resume. well FYI he held the WBA and WBC b4 fighting Joe which means he won the WBA twice. when he beat sartisan that wasn't the first time he won that belt . get your info right he beat manny siacca , eric lucas,Anthony Mundine, Markus Beyer, and andrade all b4 he fought the man at 168 he earned his wat to the top . LIspey hardley did anything close to that . he didn't win 2 world title s b4 fighting b-hop. he ddin't got through 5 of the top 10 fighter in his wieght class back to back:good
     
  15. Nestea

    Nestea Thirst Remover Full Member

    7,336
    0
    Feb 25, 2008
    You don't have to think...

    Hopkins.