Which cut was worse, Campbell's or Cotto's?

It's not about the cut.

 

Cotto's was bigger, Nate's has more damage internally...

 

Cottos without a doubt. He could of took the easy way out and got the decision after 4 rounds but he realised that his PR fans had come to see a real fight on the night b4 the parade and fought on like a true warrior win, lose or draw.

 

clearly look at the damn cut Campbells looks like a nick compared to Cottos

 

Both cuts were disturbing them but it's funny nobody talks about Campbell's cut on Diaz or Clottey's injury after being slam-dunked.

 

Cotto's easily

 

I hope Pacquiao doesn't cut Cotto.

 

this is clearly a poll made to prove us that Cotto has a great heart. And its true, he didn,t quit like a ***** claiming he sees spots

 

Its not the cut dude, Campbell suffered a vitreous hemmorhage. There was inner bleeding in his eye, he couldn't see well. At the age of 37 there is more to worry about than getting a win.

 

You're asking which cut was worse to generate that Cotto didn't quit when his cut was worse, or that Nate quit when his wasn't as worse.


Cotto cut was worse but he eye wasn't ****ed.

 

Cotto fought through a rough cut.

he didn't has issues with his eye and not being able to see.