Who Won the Fight in your Original Scorecard? Diaz or Malignaggi?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by asero, Aug 22, 2009.


  1. Jeff Young

    Jeff Young Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,656
    0
    Jun 5, 2009
    this is one of my other points, paulie landed the cleaner more effective punches and was the agressor

    punch stats even stated paulie out threw the pressure fighter diaz by 200!
     
  2. Hexus

    Hexus WBA = Why Box Anyways Full Member

    196
    0
    Apr 29, 2009
    I had it 115-113 Malignaggi. I could've seen a draw, or even possibly for a point the other way since Diaz was the home town boy, but I definitely was shocked when the 118-110 score was announced, I nearly turned off my television right there. I'm glad I didn't miss the Kellerman interview with Paulie though, rofl.

    Harold Lederman says it before every fight on HBO, and we all should know here that boxing isn't judged on punches alone, there's just an emphasis on "clean, effective punching."
     
  3. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,111
    Jul 24, 2004
    Malignaggi landed some clean sharp jabs and a few nice hooks and uppercuts as well, just not to the degree that Diaz was landing his.

    Paulie just does'nt have heavy hands. He was'nt able to move Diaz.....but he was throwing a nice sharp jab with good snap to it tonight.......which why my scorecard was razor close, 115-114 Diaz.
     
  4. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,111
    Jul 24, 2004
    Please dont discredit yourself by quoting Harold Lederman......he's as inconsistent a scorer as they come........how the hell he had Malignaggi winning round 9 which was clear as day for Diaz, is beyond my comprehension.:patsch
     
  5. snell

    snell FEU-NRMF Full Member

    1,286
    0
    Jun 2, 2009

    ****** ^^ is defensive :lol:

    nahhh.. jmm just fought another overhyped bum. dont plead your case just to make your boys victory golden :rofl

    Diaz
    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    8.38%
    Malinaggi
    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    81.68%
    Draw
    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    9.95
     
  6. Hexus

    Hexus WBA = Why Box Anyways Full Member

    196
    0
    Apr 29, 2009
    I was actually quoting something Harold Lederman says, he is quoting the rules of the sanctioning bodies, but I thought you would know that. :deal
     
  7. Two Shakes

    Two Shakes Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,927
    176
    Sep 7, 2008
    115-113 Paulie.the judge who had Diaz winning it by 8 rounds should be barred from ever sitting ringside !!
    Level after 10, i gave Paulie the last 2 rounds.
     
  8. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,111
    Jul 24, 2004
    There was alot of shoeshine in that extra workrate by Malignaggi which makes it look like on paper like he was much busier then Diaz......but realitiy is that Diaz'
    shots had alot more mustard behind them when you look at the whole punch output landscape as a whole.
     
  9. JasonChaos27

    JasonChaos27 Active Member Full Member

    1,457
    0
    Mar 15, 2008
    Look, I was just gonna read through these and not comment, but you are a ****ing idiot. Every post you have made in this thread makes no sense at all. Paulie lost the fight because he doesnt punch as hard as Diaz? Really? Hmmm, I didnt know close rounds go to the guy that has more power. I thought rounds were judged by ring generalship, cleaner more effective punching and aggression. So by your rules and standards Paulie cant win a fight unless he fights a flyweight.

    Second of all, Paulie is to blame for fighting in Texas? As if he had a ****ing choice? Ring size picked by Diaz, weight picked by Diaz, ref and judges Diaz. Im shocked Paulie had the choice of what color robe he could wear. Instead of blaming Paulie for fighting in Texas, place the blame where it really lies, biased hometown judging.
     
  10. Jeff Young

    Jeff Young Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,656
    0
    Jun 5, 2009
    i agree i thought diaz did appear to have more zip on his shots that he did land, i still got the impression that paulie was more effective, cleaner, and busier of the 2......the only clear diaz rounds that where solid connects for him was rounds 2,5,7....i thought the rest of his rounds were very sloppy and hard to score...while paulie's rounds were very clean...i thought paulie pretty much pitched a shutout rounds 8-12 with the exception of 12
     
  11. renyo

    renyo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,417
    332
    Jul 21, 2007
    Damn I was a fool. I thought Paulie was a bum with nothing to prove. He fought hard and proved me wrong. He belongs in the mix even as weak as a 1 handed fighter he is. God bless him with another hand.
     
  12. maciek4

    maciek4 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,407
    1
    Jul 24, 2004
    Which was about right, wasnt it? :huh
     
  13. shelterr

    shelterr Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,886
    0
    Sep 7, 2006
    I has paulie by 1 or 2 rounds. A draw would have been a bummer, but a win for Diaz is bull****. Diaz looked one dimensional and afraid against a guy who can't hit. Diaz does not react well to cuts. Pure and simple.
     
  14. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,376
    309
    Jan 8, 2009
    aggression should have more weight than ring generalship. No matter how you control the tempo of the fight if you do not inflict damage on your opponent, it wont work for you.

    Pauli has the reputation of having no power that's why the judges find it hard to give rounds where they landed evenly to malignaggi
     
  15. renyo

    renyo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,417
    332
    Jul 21, 2007
    Come next door Asero I'd like to hear your opinion on my topic.