Better Resume: Manny Pacquiao or Pernell Whitaker?

and sweet pea won by ud's and sd's while the moving midget pac who came from 106 obliterated his oversized opponents and didnt clown and run away to get his points dealdeal

 

The Fillipino Fraud obliterated weight-drained leftovers.:yep:yep:yep:yep

Fanny Pac has his share of SD's and UD's on resume as well.:hi:

 

ayyyy,,, d ****** is butt hurt he couldnt comprehend that his bf is a clown who's ko ratio of 36 % constitutes a powerpuff girl talent.. nutnut

coming from 106.... weight drained my ass. :hey:hey

pernell=KO% 36.96
pac= KO% 68.52

hahaha

 

Exactly what I thought:roll:

 

So who does Sweat Pea have on his resume that makes it better than Pac's?

 

i am waiting for this...^^

 

Prime; Trinidad, DLH, Chavez, Roger Mayweather, McGirt, Paez, Haugen, Jose Luis Ramirez ... this guys fought in an era that was a bit tougher than it is now and i'm telling you with as limited as Pac is now, he wouldn't be p4p top 10 let alone #1.

 

I forgot about Julio Cesar Vasquez

 

Jose Luis Ramirez
Greg Haugen
Azumah Nelson
Rafael Pineda
Buddy McGirt
Jorge Paez
Roger Mayweather
Julio Vasquez
Wilfredo Rivera
Julio Caesar Chavez (WE ALL KNOW HE WON)

Not to mention his performances post prime verses DLH and Hurtado. He arguably didn't lose a fight until he fought Tito and by then he was a certified powder head.

He's resume has far more depth and consistency, not to mention he showed the type of prowess against his opposition that Pac has yet to (JMM is Pac's best opponent to date PERIOD and we all know that story.)

 

delete

 

Yeah by far ... better class of fighters ... better opposition ... in an era dominated by tough fighters ... some experts think that Pernell only lost 1 fight legit. Tito (he fought 10 rounds with a broken Jaw and still managed to go the distance) ....

Alot of spectators believe he beat Chavez, DLH, and Ramirez ...

 

Got spanked by Trinidad who used him for the name on his resume. Lost to DLH. The Chavez travesty is the best item there. Mayweather, McGirt, Paez, Haugen, and Ramirez don't come close to equalling Pac's victories
over Morales, Marquez, Barrera, Pac's move up the scales to crush DLH and Hatton, and Pac's status as the only lineal champion in four weight classes.

 

why is it that pacquiao fans have to compare him to every good fighter that's ever lived? i have a theory and i think it's just that they are so insecure and they want everyone to say pacquiao was the best fighter of all time. in fact, there was a poll at pacland asking was pacquiao better than sugar ray robinson and guess what, pacquiao fans voted mostly for pacquiao. this is really getting ridiculous and irritating. that's why i think most fans hope pacquiao gets his ass beat by miguel cotto to shut up these no knowledge fans. pacquiao may be one of the best fighters in this era but guess what, there were other eras too with many great fighters as well. if pacquiao stops being such a prima donna by demanding other fighters fight him at catchweight maybe we can get a better picture of just how great pacquiao really is!

 

Good post but it's pointless trying to reason with morons. These people are fans of fighters, not boxing.

 

i think it's better to have 'no-knowledge-about-boxing' fans than no fans at all..