Are people siding with Paulie becuase???

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Bazooka, Aug 23, 2009.


  1. Bazooka

    Bazooka Pimp C Wants 2 Be Me Full Member

    44,390
    6
    Oct 23, 2005
    Your input doesnt count the user name there shows that even if Paulie was knocked out you would cry robbery, get out of my thread
     
  2. Rico Spadafora

    Rico Spadafora Master of Chins Full Member

    45,649
    4,162
    Feb 20, 2008
    People are siding with him because he won the fight. 118-110 is a ****ing disgrace. Period.
     
  3. Bazooka

    Bazooka Pimp C Wants 2 Be Me Full Member

    44,390
    6
    Oct 23, 2005
    I agree 118-110 is a disgrace but the fight was close and in a close fight against Diaz who obviously has GBP behind him as a fighter you must prepair to deal with that if you dont have a solid enough game plan to ensure a clear win then dont take the fight.

    Paulies mistake was he allowed Diaz to get off in the early rounds, he lost, close but he lost it could have gone to him though it was that close I didnt score it that way Diaz by one round stop crying this is boxing this **** happens, the scores are the problem 118-110 is what we should be looking at not that Paulie got robbed a win but that he deserved better on the cards.
    This content is protected
     
  4. Club Fighter

    Club Fighter Boxing Addict banned

    4,329
    1
    Oct 12, 2005
    115-113 Diaz. I'm gonna go out on a limb and say you can actually score that fight 118-110 Diaz. And scoring a fight 118-110 doesn't mean that one person got drubbed it just means that one of the combatants did enough to win 10 out of 12 rounds, the margin by which he won each round doesn't matter. And depending on how you score a fight, an argument can be made that Diaz won 118-110.
     
  5. ABN3R

    ABN3R ¡Acho! A mi plín Full Member

    522
    0
    Jul 20, 2009
    Let’s agree, the 118-110 score card was way off,
    Fight could have gone either way or a draw,
    What Paulie did was right, how boxing is bull$h1t, too much politics in boxing,
    He has the ball to call it as it is,it doesn't matter who it is, if is DLH or not.
     
  6. Aint no stoppin

    Aint no stoppin Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,225
    974
    Dec 15, 2008
    I thought paulie pretty much controlled the fight and that says something!
    Nobody thought he could keep diaz away from him and land himself some good combinations too! Khan vs paulie would be good! Go Magic man!:bbb
     
  7. Rico Spadafora

    Rico Spadafora Master of Chins Full Member

    45,649
    4,162
    Feb 20, 2008
    honestly Paulie's problem is he is feather fisted and throws almost no right hands. Although he is scoring with the punches they do not look as impressive to the judges as a guy with better pop would.

    I have no problem with 115-113 either way that is what I scored for Paulie. Overall it just pisses me off that this crap keeps happening Laurence Cole is an AWFUL referee he has been reprimanded multiple times for shady **** yet because of his daddy he is allowed to continue to referee fights.


    I have been following the Baby Bull since his days on Friday Night Fights 5 years ago but something just does not look right with him either since the Campbell fight.

    If I was a casual Boxing fan and saw 118-110 scored by one of the judges I would not watch again hell last night made me ashamed to be a Boxing fan. I am sick and tired of this ****.

    :good
     
  8. David_TheMan

    David_TheMan ESB Sage Full Member

    5,908
    2
    Dec 31, 2007
    Paulie got his ass whooped last night, he landed no meaningful punches, everytime Diaz got inside he did. A lot of there output was blocked by each other, but Juan made his counters worth it, while Paulie would jab and run away and occasionaly throw a 1-2 that had no effect.

    At most I could see Paulie getting 4 rounds, I could only give him 3.

    People love the underdog and like to ***** about "the system" and they are using Paulie as a mouthpiece to voice their frustration. I feel sorry that Paulie actually believes that he did enough to win the fight last night.
     
  9. Knives7

    Knives7 Boxing Addict banned

    7,196
    2
    Jan 24, 2009
    Because many thought that Paulie controlled the fight and out boxed Juan. Seriously.... Even Juan's corner men were getting frustrated with Juan, and they thought he was losing.

    There should be a Juan Diaz - Paulie Malignaggi 2.
     
  10. David_TheMan

    David_TheMan ESB Sage Full Member

    5,908
    2
    Dec 31, 2007
    They probably would have been open for that if Paulie hadn't have whined like a little baby back ***** post fight.
     
  11. nezy37

    nezy37 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,241
    0
    Jul 13, 2007
    :lol:

    no, you should never score another fight
     
  12. Brooklyn Boxer

    Brooklyn Boxer Active Member Full Member

    1,232
    0
    Sep 8, 2007
    People are sided with Paulie because it's clear that he won a close fight. This fight reminded me of the Chris John vs Rocky fight. That fight was a close fight but it was clear for most people who watched that fight that Chris John won that fight. The Paulie vs Diaz fight is an example of close fight with a clear winner. That winner was Paulie Malignaggi.
     
  13. nezy37

    nezy37 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,241
    0
    Jul 13, 2007
    I wouldn't say clear, but I would say it was closer than what the cards indicated. I thought John beat Juarez too.
     
  14. VX.Nefarious

    VX.Nefarious Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,871
    2
    Aug 14, 2009
    i was rooting for diaz, but paulie gained my respect
     
  15. ocelot

    ocelot Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,122
    13
    Nov 21, 2007
    Diaz looked like a blood-soaked tampon by the end of that fight. I'm not a Paulie fan, but Malignaggi won the fight clearly. Maybe by only a couple of rounds, but he won. It doesn't matter though, the Baby Bull**** will get KTFO by the next real opponent he faces. He's a B-level fighter at best.