Who among Floyd, JMM, Cotto and PAC is the most overpaid and underperforming boxer?

Here's the truth... and I think you don't want to hear this again...


...

This content is protected

...

 

you admitted that floyd also fought old fighters, but pac is the only one who's overpaid for doing that? you're just hating man :-(

and hatton wasn't at his original best weight when floyd fought him atsch

i didn't vote in this poll coz i think that these fighters deserved what they're getting. they earned it.

 

... there he goes back to hiding...
.

 

That dude must have been drinking too much Martini. Pac had only fought three old fighters namely: Delahoya, Barrera and Marquez but Barrera and Marquez were old only in the rematch fights as they were below 30 when Pac fought them the first time.

 

Hatton could have fought Floyd at 140..but chose not to.:deal

He outweighed Mayweather in the ring anyway...so the WW excuse don't cut it.


Most of Floyd's 39 fights are at 130 and 135..Hatton is the naturally bigger man.

 

:rofl:nut

 

this question is stupid cause floyd does not underperform and this is 100% made to target floyd...

 

Dude, If you were sober enough, you would realize that MAB was very far from being shot when Pac fought him the first time. Barrera was only 29 then and was on a winning streak for heaven's sake. It's a fact that MAB won six consecutive fights after that fight and won a 130 belt in the process! MAB definitely was not shot but looked like one as he was overwhelmed by Pac's speed and relentless attack! Morales might be past his prime during the trilogy with Pac but no, he too was not shot!

 

I agree. How can you say a boxer is underperforming when he uses his mouth as much as his fists when fighting and sometimes even his bicycle? :good

 

Good point!

 

i think they all get what they deserve.all of them knockout people out and make them look shity.

 

:rofl:rofl

 

MARK MY WORDS LMAO