Who among Floyd, JMM, Cotto and PAC is the most overpaid and underperforming boxer?

Overpaid and underperforming has to be Mayweather.

Although i loved the Hatton fight as Hatton forced Mayweather to actually fight and show people what he can do when firing on all cylinders.

 

their fight was at WW limit not at JWW, which is hatton's best/natural weight. what a moron :nut

 

Hatton didn't want the fight at 140...his best weight.:deal

Hatton outweighed Floyd in the ring,even at 147.


MOST of Floyd's 39 fights are at 130 and 135.

Ricky is naturally bigger than Floyd.

 

wtf? he didn't want to fight floyd at his best weight, yet he fought floyd in a division that's not comfortable for him? if that's your logic, i'll pass :nut

 

Mayrunner, easy!

 

That's exactly how it went down.

WHERE WERE YOU?

Hatton's camp wanted no parts at 140..claiming he wasn't ready.

The weight didn't matter because Hatton came in bigger anyway.

 

so that's it. hatton didn't fight floyd at 140 coz he's not yet ready at that time, right? but when he's ready to fight floyd, at what division did the fight took place?

let me ask you this, do you believe that floyd fought everyone at their strongest/natural weights/divisions (which martini do insist)? his upcoming fight just strengthens my argument.

 

Funny you'd ask such a question.

Fanny sure as hell didn't fight the best at 135..Diaz nor will he at 147.

Cotto is damaged goods that's why Fanny is fighting him

Shane bent over backwards to get Pac...but Cotto was CHERRYPICKED because he's on the slide:yep


Floyd has never put a weight restriction any fighter.

He doesn't care what his opponents weigh..

Pac doesn't have the skills not to care.:deal

 

Floyd is clearly the only overpaid, he should be getting about the same as Pacman, but both JMM and Cotto are underpaid IMO.

As for underperforming, I don't think any of these fighters fit that, they belong at the cream of the top at boxing and always leave it all in the ring, got to say I'm a fan of all of them.

If you want to talk overpaid and underperforming then Oscar De La Hoya beats anyone by far in recent years.

 

didn't you read what i and martini were arguing about? tha last part of this post.

i just don't believe that floyd fought everybody at their original best weight class. that's it.

i never claimed that pac fought the best of 135 in diaz.

so let me ask you again, do you believe, like what martini posted, that floyd fought everybody at their original best weight class? :think

 

Next time, read before you talk ****....Now, you sound stupid.....AS USUAL!!!:rofl

 

if nallege has an IQ of 70... this must be -70 :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

how can you be over paid & under performing?

its contradictory in a way.... if you were under performing you wouldnt get over paid... so none of them

 

Well what do you know, another dumbass thread started by a *******.

 

Listen carefully you stupid muther****er. How does it matter if the weight was at 147 not 140 if Hatton weighed the same on the night?

Tell me dumbass. If Hatton weighs 152 on the night and 152 at 140. What difference is there. You cant really be this stupid can you lol?

The reason why Hatton struggled with Collazo had nothing to do with the wieght, it had to do with the fact that Collazo is a damn good fighter, much better then ****ing shot Castillo and Urango.